2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A literature review for large-scale health information system project planning, implementation and evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
160
0
15

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
5
160
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most significant barriers will be the inherent resistance of the healthcare industry to change its current practices, 40 especially relating to organizational, structural, technological, and human factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most significant barriers will be the inherent resistance of the healthcare industry to change its current practices, 40 especially relating to organizational, structural, technological, and human factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suomessa sähköisten terveyspalvelujen kehittämistä on mallinnettu esimerkiksi sosioteknisen teorian mukaisesti Varkaudessa [31] ja ASSI-hankkeessa [32]. Käyttöönottoihin vaikuttavat kirjallisuuden mukaan useat tekijät [33][34][35]. Alueellisista ja paikallisista sote-tietojärjestelmien käyttöönotoista Suomessa löytyy julkaistua tietoa ainakin Turusta [30], Satakunnan Makropilotista [12][13][14], Helsingistä [7], Forssan seudusta [27], Satakunnasta [36][37][38], Kuopiosta [39], Keski-Suomesta [40], Tampereelta [20], Itä-Savosta [41], Varsinais-Suomesta [42], Varkaudesta [31] ja Sipoosta [43].…”
Section: Johdantounclassified
“…In one conceptual model the technical aspects, design and implementation consequences of a management information system (MIS) are assumed to be within the control of a single organisation, with MIS design responsive to the information needs of that organisation and its management [4]. However, situations regularly occur where MIS are required to function across different organisations and stakeholder groups [5], thus design and implementation should ideally be responsive to multiple management and information needs [6]. For example intervention providers may use MIS for administration, public health commissioners may access MIS data to monitor and commission interventions and researchers may use these data to evaluate intervention effectiveness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%