2011
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.154484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for Salivary Testosterone with Adult Male Reference Interval Determination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The protocol was optimized to capture free T87 and C88 and to detect the typically low T concentrations observed in women47. Previously reported mean intra-assay coefficients of variation (CV) were 5.3% for T and 8.7% for C, whereas mean inter-assay CV were 9% for T and 7.8% for C4788.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protocol was optimized to capture free T87 and C88 and to detect the typically low T concentrations observed in women47. Previously reported mean intra-assay coefficients of variation (CV) were 5.3% for T and 8.7% for C, whereas mean inter-assay CV were 9% for T and 7.8% for C4788.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the collection of serum, which is invasive and expensive, collection of saliva is relatively straightforward and requires minimal training. We have recently demonstrated that Sal-T can be reliably and accurately measured by a highly sensitive and specific liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method (16). In a validation study comparing samples from the same individuals, we found that Sal-T in adult men and women correlated more strongly with calculated serum free-T than serum total-T (17) and was also unaffected by variations in sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) (18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,20,26 Another major concern in our study is the absence of CFT validation compared to the AFTC determinated by ED in our population. 28 Our established reference values in healthy young men are a basic diagnostic tool for the suitable study of hypogonadism in our surroundings and are also useful for clinics in the Mediterranean region whose laboratories employ the same methods for determining TT and SHBG. 19 However, as we report, our method of TT quantification is very reliable, and the CFT and the AFTC were almost identical in studies of populations with SHBG capacities varying from low to extremely high, as in hyperthyroidism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%