2012
DOI: 10.13109/glot.2012.88.1-4.122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Linguistic Analysis of the Vase Inscriptions of Sophilos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 61 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of this sign for /d ͡ z/ or perhaps /t ͡ s/ in Eteocretan could be related(Duhoux 1982, 165 f.).128 Cf. Kirchhoff 1826;Powell 1987;Ruijgh 1997;Slings 1998;Clackson 2002; Gomis García and Striano Corrochano 2017.129 Sturtevant 1940, 91; Schwyzer 1959, 211; Allen 1987, 60; Ruijgh 1997, 565;Hawkins 2012, §2.1.2. 130 Clackson 2002 Lejeune (1972, 72) argues for the weakening, while Slings (1998, 655) supports a fricative realisation [x] of the stop in the sequence khi-sigma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of this sign for /d ͡ z/ or perhaps /t ͡ s/ in Eteocretan could be related(Duhoux 1982, 165 f.).128 Cf. Kirchhoff 1826;Powell 1987;Ruijgh 1997;Slings 1998;Clackson 2002; Gomis García and Striano Corrochano 2017.129 Sturtevant 1940, 91; Schwyzer 1959, 211; Allen 1987, 60; Ruijgh 1997, 565;Hawkins 2012, §2.1.2. 130 Clackson 2002 Lejeune (1972, 72) argues for the weakening, while Slings (1998, 655) supports a fricative realisation [x] of the stop in the sequence khi-sigma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%