1993
DOI: 10.1109/34.211474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A linear programming approach for the weighted graph matching problem

Abstract: Abstract-One is based on an eigendecomposition approach and the other on a symmetric polynomial transform. Experimental results showed that the LP approach is superior in matching graphs than both other methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
152
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
152
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quadratic assignment problem, however, is NP-hard [13], and suboptimal solutions are achieved by means of various relaxations. Approaches are either purely discrete [14], [15] or continuous [16], based on the solution of differential equations that always converge to a discrete assignment.…”
Section: R Ecent Advances In Communication and Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quadratic assignment problem, however, is NP-hard [13], and suboptimal solutions are achieved by means of various relaxations. Approaches are either purely discrete [14], [15] or continuous [16], based on the solution of differential equations that always converge to a discrete assignment.…”
Section: R Ecent Advances In Communication and Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, graph matching is a difficult problem in itself. Whenever the two graphs to be matched have the same number of nodes, graph matching is equivalent to searching for graph isomorphism and polynomial time solutions exist in this case, [14], [15], [16]. It is however rarely the case that the image graph have the same size as the object graph: The problem is therefore equivalent to maximum subgraph matching -find the largest isomorphic subgraphs of the two graphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except for some earlier approaches not suited to sub-graph matching, such as [8][9][10], most optimization-based algorithms require the explicit calculation of compatibility values between vertices and edges, either using compatibility functions or probability distributions. In addition, some Bayesian-based approaches fail when graphs are fully connected [14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the first approach constructs a state-space, which is searched using heuristics to reduce complexity [2][3][4][5][6][7]. The second approach, which is the one adopted here, is based on function optimization techniques which include Bayesian, linear-programming, continuation, eigen-decomposition, polynomial transform, genetic, neural network and relaxation-based methods [1,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%