2012
DOI: 10.2528/pierm12101903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Linear Antenna Array Failure Correction Using Firefly Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is realistic to recover the radiation pattern of a dipole antenna array system with approximately same quality without replacing the failed element by readjusting the excitations of the healthy elements of the antenna array system. Researchers have proposed various techniques to recover the array system in presence of defective elements such as an orthogonal method [1], conjugate gradient based method [2,3], applying genetic algorithm (GA) [4,5], with the hybridization of GA and fast fourier transform (FFT) [6], applying an adaptive neuronal system [7], with simulated annealing (SA) [8,9], particle swarm optimization (PSO) [10][11][12], and firefly algorithm (FA) [13,14]. These above mentioned methods are either having large number of control parameters to set for the operation or showing slow convergence characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is realistic to recover the radiation pattern of a dipole antenna array system with approximately same quality without replacing the failed element by readjusting the excitations of the healthy elements of the antenna array system. Researchers have proposed various techniques to recover the array system in presence of defective elements such as an orthogonal method [1], conjugate gradient based method [2,3], applying genetic algorithm (GA) [4,5], with the hybridization of GA and fast fourier transform (FFT) [6], applying an adaptive neuronal system [7], with simulated annealing (SA) [8,9], particle swarm optimization (PSO) [10][11][12], and firefly algorithm (FA) [13,14]. These above mentioned methods are either having large number of control parameters to set for the operation or showing slow convergence characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed technique is different from [3-8, 12, 13] in the sense that the authors here considered only the length and spacing of failed elements as design variables to obtain the corrected radiation pattern with desired requirements. Moreover, this technique is different from [3][4][5][6][7][8]17] in the sense that authors here considered real antennas including mutual coupling effect. In addition, coupling effect is also compensated by minimizing the return loss of the antenna elements with corrected pattern.…”
Section: Major Contribution Of the Proposed Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A method for array failure correction with digitally beamforming using linear symmetrical array has been described in [5]. Antenna array failure correction using firefly, differential search and improved bat algorithm is discussed in [6][7][8]. A comprehensive study of the mutual coupling that exists in antenna arrays has been discussed by various researchers [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, adaptive neural system 20 , simulated annealing (SA) 21 , firefly algorithm (FA) 22 and hybrid methods 23 . Some stochastic approaches have been also proposed to solve the problem of antenna array along A Linear Antenna Array Failure Correction with Null Steering using Firefly Algorithm with null steering problem using simulated annealing (SA) 24 , particle swarm optimization (PSO) 25 and hybrid method 26 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%