“…39 Given the turbulent political and socio-economic effects experienced during the initial decades after the Reformation, these reading practices are to be expectedand we should not be surprized to find the presses issuing texts through which England likely to be entry codes to precisely the kind of reading they protest against'. 45 So we should not accept the prefatory passage at its wordand, nevertheless, the longer prefatory passage (which no one ever quotes) is much less partisan. The anti-Catholic lines are actually framed within a longer passage which focuses upon the importance of diversity and toleration: the first line states that 'The God of all glory created universally all creatures, to set forth his prayers, both those which we esteem profitable in use and pleasure, and also those which we accompt noisome and loathsome'; it then attests that 'the good doings of the good, & the evil acts of the wicked, the happy success of the blessed, and the woeful proceedings of the 47 This emphasis on multiplicity of worship might be nothing more than moralising spin, but if we read it against the Brooke poem's wider resistance to anti-Catholicism, it may well have meant more to its Elizabethan readers (and appropriators) than recent critics have allowed.…”