2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A limiter-based well-balanced discontinuous Galerkin method for shallow-water flows with wetting and drying: One-dimensional case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
62
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second test case, which goes back to the work of Thacker, is also defined in a parabolic bowl but describes a circular flow with a linear surface elevation in the wet part of the domain. It is the 2D analog of the 1D test case described in the work of Vater et al Here, we follow the particular setup of the work of Gallardo et al In a square domain Ω=[−2,2] 2 with bottom topography b = b ( x )=0.1( x 2 + y 2 ), an analytical solution of the shallow‐water equations is given by alignleftalign-1h(x,t)align-2=max0,0.1xcos(ωt)+ysin(ωt)+34b(x)align-1(u,v)(x,t)align-2= ω2false(sinfalse(ωtfalse),cosfalse(ωtfalse)false)1emif.5emhfalse(bold-italicx,tfalse)>0bold01emotherwise, with ω=0.2g.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second test case, which goes back to the work of Thacker, is also defined in a parabolic bowl but describes a circular flow with a linear surface elevation in the wet part of the domain. It is the 2D analog of the 1D test case described in the work of Vater et al Here, we follow the particular setup of the work of Gallardo et al In a square domain Ω=[−2,2] 2 with bottom topography b = b ( x )=0.1( x 2 + y 2 ), an analytical solution of the shallow‐water equations is given by alignleftalign-1h(x,t)align-2=max0,0.1xcos(ωt)+ysin(ωt)+34b(x)align-1(u,v)(x,t)align-2= ω2false(sinfalse(ωtfalse),cosfalse(ωtfalse)false)1emif.5emhfalse(bold-italicx,tfalse)>0bold01emotherwise, with ω=0.2g.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A standard benchmark problem to evaluate wetting and drying behavior of a numerical scheme is the wave runup onto a plane beach. We perform this quasi-one-dimensional test case 38 to compare the results to the ones already obtained with the one-dimensional version of the scheme in the work of Vater et al 21 The test case admits an exact solution following a technique developed in the work of Carrier et al 39 In a rectangular domain Ω = [−400, 50 000]×[0, 400] with linearly sloping bottom topography b(x) = 5000− x, = 0.1, and initial velocity u(x, 0) = 0, an initial surface elevation is prescribed in nondimensional variables by…”
Section: Tsunami Runup Onto a Linearly Sloping Beachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whenever the fluid depth h is below this tolerance, the velocity is set to zero. In [47] it was shown that the specific value of this parameter does not affect the stability of the scheme. It rather influences the accuracy of the wetting and drying computation.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method is mass-conservative and preserves the steady state at rest (i.e., it is well-balanced). A comprehensive presentation of the scheme including its validation with respect to the shallow water equations is given in Vater et al [47].…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation