2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11565-011-0129-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A limit model for thermoelectric equations

Abstract: We analyze the asymptotic behavior corresponding to the arbitrary high conductivity of the heat in the thermoelectric devices. This work deals with a steady-state multidimensional thermistor problem, considering the Joule effect and both spatial and temperature dependent transport coefficients under some real boundary conditions in accordance with the Seebeck-Peltier-Thomson cross-effects. Our first purpose is that the existence of a weak solution holds true under minimal assumptions on the data, as in particu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(72 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us consider the following problem that extends the thermoelectric problems, which were introduced in [10,11], in the sense of that the thermoelectric coefficient is assumed to be a given but arbitrary nonlinear function. The electrical current density j and the energy flux density J = q + φj, with q being the heat flux vector, satisfy    ∇ · j = 0 in Ω −j · n = g on Γ N j · n = 0 on Γ    ∇ · J = 0 in Ω J · n = 0 on Γ N −J · n = f λ (θ)|θ| ℓ−2 θ − γ(θ)θ ℓ−1 e on Γ, (1) for ℓ ≥ 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us consider the following problem that extends the thermoelectric problems, which were introduced in [10,11], in the sense of that the thermoelectric coefficient is assumed to be a given but arbitrary nonlinear function. The electrical current density j and the energy flux density J = q + φj, with q being the heat flux vector, satisfy    ∇ · j = 0 in Ω −j · n = g on Γ N j · n = 0 on Γ    ∇ · J = 0 in Ω J · n = 0 on Γ N −J · n = f λ (θ)|θ| ℓ−2 θ − γ(θ)θ ℓ−1 e on Γ, (1) for ℓ ≥ 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case n > 2: Setting M 1 = S 2,2 , and M 2 = K 2,2 , by using (6), and w β ∈ W 1,2 (Ω) ֒→ L q 1 χ (Ω), (7), and w β ∈ W 1,2 (Ω) ֒→ L qχ (∂Ω) with qχ = 2(n − 1)/(n − 2) i.e. χ = (s − 1)(n − 1)/[s(n − 2)] > 1 if s > n − 1.…”
Section: ∞ -Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal effects on steady-state physical and technological models, whatever they are from mechanical engineering, electrochemistry, biomedical engineering, to mention a few, appear as an additional elliptic equation with a nonlinear radiation-type boundary condition into the coupled PDE system under study [5][6][7][8]. These form a boundary value problem constituted by an elliptic quasilinear second order equation in divergence form with the leading coefficient depending on the spatial variable and on the solution itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we argue as in the above case, concluding (13) with κ = 4. For both cases, we can extract a subsequence of u m , still denoted by u m , such that it weakly converges to u in W 1,q (Ω), where u ∈ V q solves the limit problem (9)…”
Section: H 1 -Solvabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E ∈ V p ′ is either the Green or the Neumann functions, E = G and E = N, in accordance with Propositions 5.1 and 5.2, respectively. To this end, we take v = E ∈ V p ′ and v = u ∈ V p as test functions in (9) and (34), respectively, obtaining the Green representation formula In the presence of the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality, we prove the following W 1,p -estimate. Proposition 6.1.…”
Section: Green Kernelsmentioning
confidence: 99%