2011
DOI: 10.1198/jasa.2011.ap10243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Likelihood Ratio Test Based Method for Signal Detection With Application to FDA’s Drug Safety Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
162
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
162
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, llr is used to rank signals. They are consistent with their P value‐based rankings . We calculated the BFDR under the EBGM model and set λthres = 2 according to Ahmed et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, llr is used to rank signals. They are consistent with their P value‐based rankings . We calculated the BFDR under the EBGM model and set λthres = 2 according to Ahmed et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Under the null, normalMnormalLnormalRj doesn't have a closed form distribution. As a consequence, the authors simulated the null distribution to calculate P values …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practically, PRR_025 and ROR_025, the lower bound of 95% confidence intervals for PRR and ROR, are also often used for the signal detection. The likelihood ratio test (LRT) is another frequentist DPA . It assumed that the drug‐induced ADE frequency follows a Poisson distribution.…”
Section: Ddi Data Mining Methods Using the Postmarketing Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the overall intent of the Bayesian approaches is that overall false positives should be reduced with a limited practical impact on false-negative rate, on an individual combination level there is naturally the possibility that this shrinkage can lead to a false negative; and there has been some research suggesting this to be the case overall for EB05 -the lower 95% confidence limit of the EBGM; for example, see Chen et al (2008) and Hauben et al (2007a) -although there are to our knowledge no studies showing that this is a problem in practice for the IC. Recent variations of frequentist methodology have appeared (Huang et al, 2012;Johnson et al, 2012), some of which have been reported to produce results similar to empirical Bayesian approaches in initial investigations (Johnson et al, 2012). For a summary of different measures of disproportionality see Table 20.3.…”
Section: Biases Related To the Drug-event Pair Reportingmentioning
confidence: 99%