2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Lightweight Radio Propagation Model for Vehicular Communication in Road Tunnels

Abstract: Radio propagation models (RPMs) are generally employed in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs) to predict path loss in multiple operating environments (e.g. modern road infrastructure such as flyovers, underpasses and road tunnels). For example, different RPMs have been developed to predict propagation behaviour in road tunnels. However, most existing RPMs for road tunnels are computationally complex and are based on field measurements in frequency band not suitable for VANET deployment. Furthermore, in tunnel a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15 There are also many examples of using the log-distance path loss model with a diffraction loss model. [16][17][18] As can be seen in Section 2, since the Deygout method overestimates the diffraction loss and the Bullington method underestimates it, the parameter ω 2 is used as shown in Equation (3) to obtain the proper diffraction loss value between the loss values calculated in the two methods. ω 2 is computed in the regression operations using Tikhonov regularization and the model based on the log-distance path loss model is proposed as follows:…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15 There are also many examples of using the log-distance path loss model with a diffraction loss model. [16][17][18] As can be seen in Section 2, since the Deygout method overestimates the diffraction loss and the Bullington method underestimates it, the parameter ω 2 is used as shown in Equation (3) to obtain the proper diffraction loss value between the loss values calculated in the two methods. ω 2 is computed in the regression operations using Tikhonov regularization and the model based on the log-distance path loss model is proposed as follows:…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The log‐distance path loss model is widely accepted in a variety of practical applications . There are also many examples of using the log‐distance path loss model with a diffraction loss model . As can be seen in Section 2, since the Deygout method overestimates the diffraction loss and the Bullington method underestimates it, the parameter ω 2 is used as shown in Equation to obtain the proper diffraction loss value between the loss values calculated in the two methods.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, identifying whether ITS-G5 can be a reliable communication link for V2V communication. Several papers constitute evaluations of ITS-G5 with simulations and/or experiments of V2V/V2I [2], [3], [4], [5], but few, to the authors knowledge, evaluate high speed highway V2V communication through an experimental design. LTE-V2X testing in the 5.9 GHz band in China [6] and 5G/ITS-G5 comparisons in Finland being two notable recent works [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, such obstruction can be modeled as either knife edge or rounded edge obstruction [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Knife edge obstruction model in most cases underestimates the diffraction loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%