2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11235-014-9884-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A lifetime extended multi-levels heterogeneous routing protocol for wireless sensor networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The limitations identified from the comprehensive review 21–30 of the existing clustering‐based routing protocols are as follows: The existing kd‐tree algorithm is capable of handling only 74% of the impact introduced by the problems of space in managing the process of insertion that is essential in improving the efficiency in the process of clustering. The existing clustering‐based routing protocol like WPO‐EECRP only focuses on energy conservation and energy optimizations rather than focusing on eliminating the other factors that decide on the process of effective cluster formation. The traditional LEACH, improved LEACH and k‐means algorithm‐based cluster routing protocol fail to handle the issues that emerge during the probabilistic selection of CHs. Most of the existing clustering‐based routing protocols incorporate energy parameter as the major factor but fail to utilize cooperation and packet forwarding capability for ensuring effective process of clustering. …”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitations identified from the comprehensive review 21–30 of the existing clustering‐based routing protocols are as follows: The existing kd‐tree algorithm is capable of handling only 74% of the impact introduced by the problems of space in managing the process of insertion that is essential in improving the efficiency in the process of clustering. The existing clustering‐based routing protocol like WPO‐EECRP only focuses on energy conservation and energy optimizations rather than focusing on eliminating the other factors that decide on the process of effective cluster formation. The traditional LEACH, improved LEACH and k‐means algorithm‐based cluster routing protocol fail to handle the issues that emerge during the probabilistic selection of CHs. Most of the existing clustering‐based routing protocols incorporate energy parameter as the major factor but fail to utilize cooperation and packet forwarding capability for ensuring effective process of clustering. …”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these drawbacks, many extension over this algorithm has been proposed including LEACH‐C, EHE‐LEACH, LEACH‐B, W‐LEACH, H‐LEACH, LEACH‐GA, Q‐LEACH, and TL‐LEACH . Also, the notion of hierarchical clustering have been utilized in other research activities to extend the lifetime of WSN.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In EEMHR, the sensor nodes are organized into a k ‐level hierarchy and the sensor selection in each level is done based on the ratio of number of alive nodes to the total number of nodes. LE‐MHR protocol tries to preserve the energy of network in higher level of network and to separate the number of nodes in different level of hierarchy. Referring to the implementation approaches, the clustering algorithms can be categorized within centralized and distributed approaches. In centralized approaches, a global view from the whole network is required to select the cluster head nodes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithms of energy consumption control consist of three categories: cluster-based schemes [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28], optimization-based schemes [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37], and backpressure-based schemes [38][39][40][41][42][43]. Clusterbased schemes can balance the energy consumption of nodes and prolong network lifetime through selecting cluster-head nodes and forming clusters according to some ingenious criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%