A Life of Research in Biological Anthropology

Harrison, G. A.

doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.105020

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 48 publications

(25 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Weiner noted, in these comments recorded shortly before his death (Harrison,1983:46), that “… I was immediately struck by the anomalous nature of the results he (Oakley) announced and then went up and spoke to him privately.” Weiner discussed the incongruities of the late Pleistocene dates and the primitive ape‐like characteristics of the mandible with Oakley and, as he related “Kenneth Oakley listened to my arguments but took the matter no further” (Harrison,1983:47). Sometime after that, as Harrison (2010:2) later recorded, Weiner “… had concluded on a night drive from London (to Oxford) that the inconsistencies in the Piltdown fossils were explicable only by being fraudulent.” And Harrison noted that the next day Weiner gave him the task of making a Piltdown replica from a modern Orang Utan jaw. As Harrison continued: “I was able to recreate a good imitation of the Piltdown jaw in about a week.…”

Section: Uncovering the Piltdown Hoaxmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Only a few of the scientific staff from the Oxford Unit followed Weiner to London, the remainder dispersed to other MRC Units. Geoffrey A. Harrison returned to Oxford as Reader in Physical Anthropology, replacing Weiner, and later was appointed Professor in a new Department of Biological Anthropology on Banbury Road, Oxford near the Science area (Harrison,2010).…”

Section: Physiology Ergonomics and The Mrc Unit For Research On CLImentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Joseph S. Weiner and the foundation of post‐WW II human biology in the United Kingdom

Little

Collins

2012

American J Phys Anthropol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Both the United States and the United Kingdom experienced a transformation in the science of physical anthropology from the period before World War II until the post-war period. In the United States, Sherwood L. Washburn is credited with being a leading figure in this transformation. In the United Kingdom, two individuals were instrumental in bringing about a similar change in the profession. These were Joseph S. Weiner at the University of Oxford and Nigel Barnicot at the University of London, with Weiner playing the principal role as leader in what Washburn called the ''New Physical Anthropology,'' that is, the application of evolutionary theory, the de-emphasis on race classification, and the application of the scientific method and experimental approaches to problem solving. Weiner's contributions to physical anthropology were broad-based-climatic and work physiology, paleoanthropology, and human variation-in what became known as human biology in the U.K. and human adaptability internationally. In the mid to late 1930s, physical anthropology was expanding in the United States. By 1939, Earnest A. Hooton (1887-1954) had trained 13 professional physical anthropologists at Harvard, with eight more to finish during the Second World War (Giles, 1997). Most of these former students of Hooton, and a few others trained elsewhere, were to find employment at colleges, universities, and institutions that were growing after the end of the war. In the United Kingdom, there were limited academic positions in physical anthropology; few students were trained before the war and almost none were trained during the war, a war that began in late 1939, more than two years before the United States entered the conflict. The prominent physical anthropology figures in the U.K. directly before the war were Sir Arthur Keith (1866Keith ( -1955, who had retired from the conservatorship of the Royal College of Surgeons in 1933, Wilfrid E. Le Gros Clark (1895-1971, who assumed the Head of Anatomy at Oxford in 1934, and Leonard H.D. Buxton (1889Buxton ( -1939, who had been a Reader in Physical Anthropology at Oxford (within Anatomy) since 1927. Le Gros Clark's interests were neuroanatomy, primatology, paleoanthropology, and evolution, and Buxton's principal interests were in craniology, archaeology, and ethnology. Buxton died right at the outset of the war in 1939, and the Readership in Physical Anthropology at Oxford was frozen then until after the war.Arthur Keith was the most prominent and influential physical anthropologist in the U.K. in the early years of the 20th century. He was a Scottish anatomist who was best known for his studies of human fossils. As a strong supporter of a European origin for modern humans, he believed that the Piltdown fossil specimens were prime examples of this European origin. He was, however, quite traditional in following his interests in physical anthropology, and as with others in the profession, both in the U.S. and the U.K, his training was based in anatomy and his interests were in skeletal ...

show abstract

Section: Uncovering the Piltdown Hoaxmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Physiology Ergonomics and The Mrc Unit For Research On CLImentioning

confidence: 99%

Joseph S. Weiner and the foundation of post‐WW II human biology in the United Kingdom

Little

Collins

2012

American J Phys Anthropol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ironically, in his first formal employment as a temporary department demonstrator in the Anatomy Department at Oxford University, he was complicit in validating the Australopithecus narrative by helping to debunk Piltdown man. Under the instruction of Joseph Weiner, he re‐created a good imitation of the Piltdown jaw, providing the conclusive evidence that the specimen was fraudulent (Harrison, )!…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

In Memoriam: Geoffrey Ainsworth Harrison (1927–2017)

James

2017

American J Hum Biol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

H arrison, G eoffrey A insworth

Little

2018

The International Encyclopedia of Biological Anthropology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Geoffrey Harrison (1927–2017) was a biological anthropologist who was one of the leaders in the United Kingdom during the second half of the twentieth century. He was a member of a cohort of distinguished individuals who helped to move biological anthropology into the modern realm of human science and evolution. His more than 50 years of research spanned areas of genetic polymorphisms, adaptive and evolutionary models, climatic variation, child growth, high‐altitude stress, and the stress of modern life. This work was always conducted within contexts of evolution and biosocial adaptation.

show abstract

A Life of Research in Biological Anthropology

Cited by 7 publications

References 48 publications

Joseph S. Weiner and the foundation of post‐WW II human biology in the United Kingdom

Joseph S. Weiner and the foundation of post‐WW II human biology in the United Kingdom

In Memoriam: Geoffrey Ainsworth Harrison (1927–2017)

H arrison, G eoffrey A insworth

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About