A life cycle assessment of the environmental impacts of cattle feedlot finishing rations

Abstract

Purpose A life cycle assessment was performed for the production of a total mixed ration (TMR) fed to finishing feedlot cattle in California, USA. The goal was to determine the climate change impact of the feed supply chain associated with the production of 1 kg finishing TMR (kg CO2e/kg TMR). A secondary goal was to compare the climate change impact of feed versus finished beef (kg CO2e/kg live weight). Methods The TMR was based on feeds commonly fed to finishing cattle in California. The Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance Partnership (LEAP) guidelines were followed for inventory data collection. System boundaries included the production of crops and feed additives, transportation of TMR components, and compound feed production. Data were sourced from national databases and Ecoinvent™ unit process data. Three scenarios were assessed as a result of allocation at the transportation step: Scenario A (100% empty return load); Scenario B (50% empty return load): and Scenario C (0% empty return load). Energy, mass, and economic allocation, and system expansion of dried distillers grain solubles (DDGS) were assessed for sensitivity analysis. Total feedlot emission data from Stackhouse-Lawson et al. (2012) were used to compare to impacts of TMR production. Results Total emissions were determined to be 0.630 kg CO2e/kg TMR for Scenario A, 0.576 kg CO2e/kg TMR for Scenario B, and 0.521 kg CO2e/kg TMR for Scenario C. Corn production, transportation, and liquid premix production were primary contributors to the life cycle impacts of TMR production. Mass-based allocation of DDGS was found to have the most significant effect on overall impacts of the finishing TMR, with a 42% increase in life cycle emissions compared to other allocation methods. For Scenario A, feed used in Angus feedlot production contributed to 76% of total Angus feedlot emissions. Additionally, feed used in Holstein feedlot production contributed to 58% of total Holstein feedlot emissions. Conclusions and recommendations The present study demonstrates a need to better assess the feed supply chain of feedlot beef production in order to accurately identify areas that have the most significant impacts on overall emissions. This may aid in minimizing impacts associated with feed production and, by extension, beef production. The present study may also serve to inform future decisions for improvements or alterations of the LEAP guidelines.

Can Intensified Pasture Systems Reduce Enteric Methane Emissions from Beef Cattle in the Atlantic Forest Biome?

“…These potent GHGs cannot be overlooked, however, when CH 4 comes from the enteric fermentation of animals that are raised on pastures, it is necessary to consider that this gas within 12 years will be converted into carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) in the atmosphere. It can thus be captured by the grasses through photosynthesis, ingested by the ruminants and eructed again, making these animals a fundamental component of this nutrient cycle [5].…”

Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Beef Cattle Breeding Based on the Ecological Cycle Model

“…It can be defined as the assembly and estimation of resource inputs and outputs ‘from cradle to grave’, including all up- and downstream activities over the entire life cycle [ 9 , 10 , 11 ]. According to previous studies, assessing environmental sustainability of production systems through life cycle assessment (LCA) to quantify GHG emissions has been a typical and extensively used method [ 12 ], especially in beef cattle production [ 13 ].…”

Feeding Bakery Former Foodstuffs and Wheat Distiller’s as Partial Replacement for Corn and Soybean Enhances the Environmental Sustainability and Circularity of Beef Cattle Farming

“…Among the feed types included in the diets of intensively reared cattle the production of soybean meal has the highest environmental impact due to the emissions related to both land use changes such as deforestation in South America and large transport distances [16,17]. Moreover, corn production accounts for 83-85% of greenhouse gases emissions for feed used in the finishing period of the fattening cycle [18].…”