2016
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xli-b4-459-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Libration Model for Enceladus Based on Geodetic Control Point Network Analysis

Abstract: Commission IV, WG IV/8 KEY WORDS: Enceladus, photogrammetry image processing, 3D control point network, estimation of shape and forced libration ABSTRACT:A new global control point network was derived for Enceladus, based on Cassini and Voyager-2 image data. Cassini images were taken from 2005 to 2014, for Voyager we have only one flyby in the middle of 1981. We have derived 3D Cartesian coordinates for 1128 control points as well as improved pointing data for 12 Voyager and 193 Cassini images in the Enceladus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Degree 2 gravity, however, predicts a thinner shell (in agreement with librations) if C 22 is 2𝜎 higher than its SOL1 central value, as suggested by the alternative gravity solution SOL2 (Table S2). Alternatively, the degree 2 shape could be responsible for the disagreement: while the new ellipsoidal shape of Thomas et al [2016] does not affect much the results (Table S6), the recent ellipsoidal shape of Nadezhdina et al [2016] predicts more degree 2 compensation and thus a thinner shell. Second, we did not allow for a lot of surface porosity in our three-layer model, but we can easily do it with a four-layer model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Degree 2 gravity, however, predicts a thinner shell (in agreement with librations) if C 22 is 2𝜎 higher than its SOL1 central value, as suggested by the alternative gravity solution SOL2 (Table S2). Alternatively, the degree 2 shape could be responsible for the disagreement: while the new ellipsoidal shape of Thomas et al [2016] does not affect much the results (Table S6), the recent ellipsoidal shape of Nadezhdina et al [2016] predicts more degree 2 compensation and thus a thinner shell. Second, we did not allow for a lot of surface porosity in our three-layer model, but we can easily do it with a four-layer model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TOPB is less flattened than TOPA and its coefficient H 22 follows the geoid (see Table S.4). The new ellipsoidal shape of Nadezhdina et al [2016] has a polar flattening (−3H 20 /2R) close to the one of TOPA but its equatorial flattening (6H 22 /R) is nearly hydrostatic (similarly to TOPB).…”
Section: S3 Shape Data (Tables S4 and S5)mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With the arrival of Cassini in the Saturn system, new global control networks (Oberst et al, 2017) and global mosaics were completed (Roatsch et al, 2008(Roatsch et al, , 2013Zubarev et al, 2014; and see global color products by P. Schenk, e.g., Planetary Photojournal, https://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA18435). Cassini-based control networks have now also been extensively utilized to evaluate Enceladus' rotation, including its libration (Giese et al, 2011;Nadezhdina et al, 2016;Thomas et al, 2016) and obliquity (Giese, 2014).…”
Section: 1029/2018ea000399mentioning
confidence: 99%