2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2010.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A level set approach for optimal design of smart energy harvesters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen S.(2010) [15] suggested that if we only consider the distribution of one material, the result of optimization will not satisfy our requirement. Considering the distribution of two material phase in the design domain simultaneously is very necessary.…”
Section: B Two-phase Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting Devices Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Chen S.(2010) [15] suggested that if we only consider the distribution of one material, the result of optimization will not satisfy our requirement. Considering the distribution of two material phase in the design domain simultaneously is very necessary.…”
Section: B Two-phase Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting Devices Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The energy harvesting device is assumed to be subjected only to static mechanical loads and so the EMCC may be rewritten as (Chen et al, 2010) …”
Section: Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have also been works performing topology optimization of energy harvesters using different design variables, for example the densities that define the presence of piezoelectric material in each finite element Contents lists available at ScienceDirect journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jmps (Nakasone and Silva, 2009), or the geometry of elastic substructure (Wein et al, 2013). In Chen et al (2010), an approach for designing the optimal configuration of a cantilever and a cylindrical piezoelectric energy harvesters with single and multiple materials was presented. A procedure for converting an inverse problem of detecting flaws in piezoelectric structures into an iterative optimization problem was given in Nanthakumar et al (2013Nanthakumar et al ( , 2014Nanthakumar et al ( , 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although cantilever beams have several advantages such as a relatively low resonant frequency, a relatively high average strain, and ease of microfabrication, they have certain limitations including their inability to scavenge multidirectional vibration and a low strain limit. Therefore, the further modification of the three-dimensinal (3-D) shape of a piezoelectric element offers the potential for improving not only the conversion efficiency but also the lifetime of the piezoelectric vibration-based energy [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%