“…(b) The wide range of diagnostic entities to which imagery techniques have been applied 163 also appears to have contributed to an overly complex-appearing state of affairs. Categories receiving intervention through imagery have included obsessive compulsive neurosis (Cautela, 1970a;Lazarus, 1965a;McGuire & Vallance, 1964), anxiety neurosis (Beck, 1970;Cautela, 1966a), phobic neurosis (Boulougouris et al, 1971;Cautela, 1971;Fazio, 1970;Hogan, 1968;Lazarus, 1965a;Lazarus & Abramovitz, 1962;Paul, 1969a) depressive neurosis (Lazarus, 1965a(Lazarus, , 1968a, conversion neurosis (Cautela, 1971;Meichenbaum, 1966), psychophysiologic disorders (Cautela, 1971), homosexuality (Barlow et al, 1969;Cautela, 1967Cautela, , 1971Feingold, 1969;Gold & Neufeld, 1965;Hammer, 1967;Rutner, 1970), fetishism (Kolvin, 1967;Kushner, 1965;Marks & Gelder, 1967;McGuire & Vallance, 1964), pedophilia (Barlow et al, 1969;Feingold, 1969), exhibitionism (Bond & Hutchison, 1965Evans, 1968;Feingold, 1969), impotence (Garfield et al, 1969;Lazarus, 1965b;Salzman, 1969), sadism (Davison, 1968;Mees, 1966), transvestism…”