A “Leaky” Pipeline and Chilly Climate in Archaeology in Canada

Abstract

This article quantifies the rate at which women archaeologists are present and retained in university departments. Drawing on publicly available data, we examine gender representation in (1) doctorates earned between 2002–2003 and 2016–2017; (2) Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) grant applications and awards at the doctoral to senior levels between 2003 and 2017; (3) tenure-stream faculty at Canadian universities in 2019; and (4) placement of Canadian PhDs in the United States. These data demonstrate that women today represent two-thirds of all Canadian doctorates in archaeology, but only one-third of Canadian tenure-stream faculty, although not all archaeologists choose an academic career. In the last 15 years, women with Canadian PhDs have been hired into tenure-track positions in Canada at rates statistically lower than men, but at higher rates in the United States. Women apply for SSHRC archaeology grants in equal proportion to their presence, but men are awarded at a slightly higher rate. We end by discussing the possible reasons for this gendered attrition, including a “chilly climate”—that is, subtle practices that stereotype, exclude, and devalue women, as well as inhospitable working environments, particularly for primary caregivers. We warn that the current COVID-19 pandemic is likely to exacerbate these existing inequalities.

An Investigation into Gender Distributions in Scholarly Publications among Dental Faculty Members in Iran

“…In contrast to some studies indicating unequal academic job opportunities for men and women (18,31,32), the opposite appears to have occurred in Iran for dentistry. In Iran, we have seen a strong openness to hiring women as dental faculty members, indicated by the fact that now a signi cantly higher percentage of new hirings are women as compared to men.…”

Resilient women scientists and the COVID-19 pandemic: an OWSD analysis

“…That this pipeline is ‘leaky’ for women is repeatedly referred to in poster and conference presentations, keynote talks and published articles. A selection of the top articles that come up in a google search for ‘leaky pipeline’, for example show the breadth and frequency of such citations: See: Barma ( 2020 ), Pittwire ( 2020 ), Overholtzer and Jalbert ( 2021 ) and Sato et al ( 2021 ). 4 The data shows that there will be numerous ‘pinch points’ or perhaps rusty holes (to continue the metaphor), where women, despite their own investments and those of others, will drop out.…”

Prestige or Perish: Publishing Decisions in Academic Archaeology

“…These disciplinary meta-analyses move beyond investigating patterns in funding and scholarship to questioning the social and logistical frameworks that undergird the operation of the profession. Such studies include investigations of the safety and accessibility of archaeological fieldwork (Colaninno et al 2020;Heath-Stout and Hannigan 2020;Meyers et al 2018;Radde 2018;Voss 2021aVoss , 2021b, the "chilly climate," gendered disciplinary culture, and "performative informality" that structure professional social networks (Baxter 2005;Leighton 2020;Moser 2007;Overholtzer and Jalbert 2021;Wylie 1993), and the difficulties in achieving work-life balance within the field (Barber 2012 ;Nelson and Crooks 1994). This work has largely focused on evaluating obstacles to equity and accessibility within archaeology, investigating how the identities of archaeologists intersect with their experiences of and participation in the discipline.…”