2021 17th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/wimob52687.2021.9606419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Lateration Method based on Effective Combinatorial Beacon Selection for Bluetooth Low Energy Indoor Positioning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that the positioning accuracy of the lateration baseline was significantly degraded, compared to BLE-RSS approaches reported in the literature (2 m to 3 m error [27], [30]), due to the adverse test scenario conditions, namely poor quantity and inappropriate distribution of anchors, unstable signal strength and hardware heterogeneity.…”
Section: Results Of the Collaborative Modelmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be noted that the positioning accuracy of the lateration baseline was significantly degraded, compared to BLE-RSS approaches reported in the literature (2 m to 3 m error [27], [30]), due to the adverse test scenario conditions, namely poor quantity and inappropriate distribution of anchors, unstable signal strength and hardware heterogeneity.…”
Section: Results Of the Collaborative Modelmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The input data to fit the model are the distances estimated in the 5 th step, the weights and the GT of the BLE anchors. The weight value for every BLE anchor is computed as the inverse of its distance square with respect to the device/user; We set the threshold value to −83 dBm and the pathloss attenuation factor to η = 2.1, as we previously used in [27] and which are in phase to values in literature [16]. Each device involved in the collaborative positioning model will have its own value for RSS 1m RX (BX) calculated from the data collected in the device registration phase (see Table II).…”
Section: B Stand-alone Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The threshold and the attenuation factor (η) values are −83 dBm and 2.1 respectively, as we used before in [16] and which are aligned with values proposed in the literature [20]. The devices used in the collaborative positioning approach have their own RSS 1m RX (BX) value according to the data gathered during the device calibration phase (see Table I).…”
Section: B Second Phase: Non-collaborative Phasementioning
confidence: 82%
“…It is worth mentioning that lateration positioning accuracy was significantly worse than RSS in the literature [16], [23]. Our real-world test scenario conditions include hardware heterogeneity (smartphones), strong NLOS and poor/inappropriate distribution of the BLE anchors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation