2018
DOI: 10.3390/molecules23020291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Lateral Flow Strip Based Aptasensor for Detection of Ochratoxin A in Corn Samples

Abstract: Ochratoxin A (OTA) is a mycotoxin identified as a contaminant in grains and wine throughout the world, and convenient, rapid and sensitive detection methods for OTA have been a long-felt need for food safety monitoring. Herein, we presented a new competitive format based lateral flow strip fluorescent aptasensor for one-step determination of OTA in corn samples. Briefly, biotin-cDNA was immobilized on the surface of a nitrocellulose filter on the test line. Without OTA, Cy5-labeled aptamer combined with comple… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be altered if a smartphone camera is used as a detector which has been the case for both pesticides (Comina et al, 2016) and mycotoxins (Machado et al, 2018). In fact when reviewing the portable axes of the TEST system, colorimetric techniques currently prevail with microorganisms (Liu et al, 2015) (Wu et al, 2015) (Jiang et al, 2016) and mycotoxins (Zhang et al, 2018) (Liu et al, 2017) (Song et al, 2014) being the most mentioned targets. As for the semi-portable section almost all reports fall in the semi-quantitative group and of these more than half of the reports used a variant of nanotechnology often using EC technology such as Palmsens for detection.…”
Section: Sensors/methods Investigated Using Test Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be altered if a smartphone camera is used as a detector which has been the case for both pesticides (Comina et al, 2016) and mycotoxins (Machado et al, 2018). In fact when reviewing the portable axes of the TEST system, colorimetric techniques currently prevail with microorganisms (Liu et al, 2015) (Wu et al, 2015) (Jiang et al, 2016) and mycotoxins (Zhang et al, 2018) (Liu et al, 2017) (Song et al, 2014) being the most mentioned targets. As for the semi-portable section almost all reports fall in the semi-quantitative group and of these more than half of the reports used a variant of nanotechnology often using EC technology such as Palmsens for detection.…”
Section: Sensors/methods Investigated Using Test Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…produced a multi‐component chromatographic test strip for the simultaneous detection of AFB 1 , OTA, and ZEN, in which the LOD for OTA was 0.5 ng mL −1 24 . Furthermore, several other novel IC methods have recently been developed to test for OTA contamination 25–27 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Furthermore, several other novel IC methods have recently been developed to test for OTA contamination. [25][26][27] Currently, the rapid detection technology is facing a variety of challenges, such as increased pollution, expensive testing equipment, professional operation requirements, high purity standards, and a large number of samples that require testing. 28,29 Comparing all of the OTA detection methods discussed above, the IC method allows for both the semi-quantitative and quantitative detection of OTA with many advantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LOD is an important parameter to reflect the sensitivity of mycotoxin detection methods. For example, the LOD of AFB 1 was 14 ng/mL using fluorescent sensor systems [ 27 ], and 1.6 ng/mL using aptamer-based fluorescent assay [ 28 ]; the LOD of OTA was 8.7 nM using nitrogen doped carbon dots and the silver nanoparticles based fluorescence method [ 29 ], 0.40 ng/mL by lateral flow strip based aptasensor [ 30 ], and 2.57 ng/mL using a novel biosensor platform [ 31 ]; the LOD of ZEN was 0.114 ng/mL using an indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ 32 ], 3.2 ng/mL using a novel recombinant cell fluorescence biosensor [ 33 ], and 0.5 ng/mL using aptamer-based fluorescence assay [ 34 ]; and the LOD of FB 1 was 11.1 ng/mL using microarray-based immunoassay with synthetic mimotopes [ 35 ], and 1.15 ng/mL by indirect ELISA [ 36 ]. The LODs of the current assay (AFB 1 : 0.21 ng/mL, OTA: 0.19 ng/mL, ZEN: 0.09 ng/mL, and FB 1 : 0.24 ng/mL) are relatively low, which justifies its higher sensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%