1996
DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1996)024<0707:alaftm>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Lateglacial age for the Main Rock Platform, western Scotland

Abstract: The sea-level record preserved in ancient shorelines forms a basis for studies of tectonic uplift, glacial loading, and the changing volume of the oceans. The existing record is derived largely from depositional features such as beach ridges and coral reefs, which contain material suitable for radiometric dating. Erosional shorelines have proved more difficult to date. Direct age estimates for shore platforms can now be obtained with exposure-dating techniques based on cosmic-ray-produced isotopes. Here we rep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(27 reference statements)
2
70
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sissons, 1974;Dawson et al, 1999). Cosmogenic exposure dating of the platform in Scotland also supports the YD age (Stone et al, 1996). However, along the southwest coast of Norway no distinct erosional features in bedrock are observed along the YD shoreline.…”
Section: Younger Dryas Shoreline Featuresmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Sissons, 1974;Dawson et al, 1999). Cosmogenic exposure dating of the platform in Scotland also supports the YD age (Stone et al, 1996). However, along the southwest coast of Norway no distinct erosional features in bedrock are observed along the YD shoreline.…”
Section: Younger Dryas Shoreline Featuresmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Stone et al (1996). removal Nishiizumi et al (1989Nishiizumi et al ( , 1991b, Brook et al (1996), Bruno et al Burial processes 14.…”
Section: Formation Of Wave-cut Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since they can rarely be dated directly, these erosional features are usually interpreted in the light of associated sedimentary deposits and/or by correla�on with other features of inferred equivalent age, although this reasoning some�mes becomes circular (Devoy, 1983). One par�cular challenge is dis�nguishing whether a rock pla�orm is gene�cally linked to the most recent phase of RSL change, or is in fact inherited from an earlier RSL phase (or phases) (Young and Bryant, 1993;Brooke et al, 1994;Stone et al, 1996; Trenhaile et al, 1999;Trenhaile, 2002Trenhaile, , 2010 Blanco Chao et al, 2003;McKenna, 2008).…”
Section: Introduc�onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since they can rarely be dated directly, these erosional features are usually interpreted in the light of associated sedimentary deposits and/or by correla�on with other features of inferred equivalent age, although this reasoning some�mes becomes circular (Devoy, 1983). One par�cular challenge is dis�nguishing whether a rock pla�orm is gene�cally linked to the most recent phase of RSL change, or is in fact inherited from an earlier RSL phase (or phases) (Young and Bryant, 1993;Brooke et al, 1994;Stone et al, 1996; Trenhaile et al, 1999;Trenhaile, 2002Trenhaile, , 2010 Blanco Chao et al, 2003;McKenna, 2008).Recent studies using a mathema�cal wave-erosion model have simulated the development of rock shore pla�orms and examined their morphology in rela�on to contras�ng pa�erns of RSL change during the Holocene (Trenhaile, 2008(Trenhaile, , 2010. In this paper, we apply this modelling approach to simulate rocky shoreline development along the northern coast of Ireland.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%