1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00370065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A large strain plasticity model for implicit finite element analyses

Abstract: Annual:11-1-89 to 12-31-90 14.The theoretical basis and numerical implementation of a plasticity model suitable for finite strains and rotations are described. The constitutive equations governing J2 flow the0!y' are formulated using strainsstresses and their rates defined on the unrotated frame of reference. Unhke models based on the classical J aumann (or corotational) stress rate, the present model predicts physically acceptable responses for homogeneous deformations of exceedingly large magnitude. The a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stress-update proceeds as follows (see [59] for full details): (1) using Rn + 1/2 rotate the spatial increment of the deformation tensor (D), evaluated from Bn+l/2 . fl.u e , to the unrotated configuration, d n + 1 / 2 = R~+1/2Dn+l/2Rn+1/2; (2) compute the unrotated Cauchy stress at n+ 1 (t n + 1) using a conventional small-strain, backward Euler procedure; and (3) compute the spatial Cauchy stress at n + 1 as (In+l = R n + 1 t n + 1 R;+1' The polar decompositions insure accuracy in the rotational operations independent of the displacement gradient magnitudes over n~n + 1.…”
Section: Finite Element Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stress-update proceeds as follows (see [59] for full details): (1) using Rn + 1/2 rotate the spatial increment of the deformation tensor (D), evaluated from Bn+l/2 . fl.u e , to the unrotated configuration, d n + 1 / 2 = R~+1/2Dn+l/2Rn+1/2; (2) compute the unrotated Cauchy stress at n+ 1 (t n + 1) using a conventional small-strain, backward Euler procedure; and (3) compute the spatial Cauchy stress at n + 1 as (In+l = R n + 1 t n + 1 R;+1' The polar decompositions insure accuracy in the rotational operations independent of the displacement gradient magnitudes over n~n + 1.…”
Section: Finite Element Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stress update proceeds as follows (see [37] for full details): (1) using Rn + 1/2 rotate the spatial increment of the deformation tensor (D), evaluated from B n + 1/2 . /J..u e , to the unrotated configuration, dn+1/2=R~+1/2Dn+1/2Rn+1/2; (2) compute the unrotated Cauchy stress at n+ 1 (t n + 1 ) using a conventional small-strain, backward Euler procedure; and (3) compute the spatial Cauchy stress at n + 1 as a n + 1 = R n + 1 t n + 1 R;+1' The polar decompositions insure accuracy in the rotational operations independent of the displacement gradient magnitudes over n ~ n + 1.…”
Section: Solution Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical class of algorithms preserving incremental objectivity are rotationally neutralized algorithms that operate on the level of kinematics only, e.g. [2,[16][17][18][19]. They make use of a rotated configuration where an evolution equation for the proper orthogonal rotation tensor K at a generalized midpoint at time t n+ , ∈ [0, 1], is defined as follows:…”
Section: Remarks On Incremental Objectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%