A Large-Scale, Multispecies Status Assessment: Anadromous Salmonids in the Columbia River Basin

Abstract

Twelve salmonid evolutionarily significant units (ESUs) throughout the Columbia River Basin are currently listed as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act; these ESUs are affected differentially by a variety of human activities. We present a standardized quantitative status and risk assessment for 152 listed salmonid stocks in these ESUs and 24 nonlisted stocks. Using data from 1980-2000, which represents a time of stable conditions in the Columbia River hydropower system and a period of ocean conditions generally regarded as poor for Columbia Basin salmonids, we estimated the status of these stocks under two different assumptions: that hatchery-reared spawners were not reproducing during the period of the censuses, or that hatchery-reared spawners were reproducing and thus that reproduction from hatchery inputs was masking population trends. We repeated the analyses using a longer time period containing both ''good' ' and ''bad'' ocean conditions (1965-2000) as a first step toward determining whether recent apparent declines are a result of sampling a period of poor ocean conditions.All the listed ESUs except Columbia River chum showed declining trends with estimated long-term population growth rates ('s) ranging from 0.85 to 1.0, under the assumption that hatchery fish were not reproducing and not masking the true . If hatchery fish were reproducing, the estimated 's ranged from 0.62 to 0.89, indicating extremely low natural reproduction and survival. For most ESUs, there was no significant decline in population growth rates calculated for the 1980-2000 vs. 1965-2000 time periods, suggesting that the current population status for most ESUs is not solely a result of changes in ocean conditions, and that without other changes, risks will persist even during upturns in ocean conditions. However, estimated population growth rates for the Snake River spring-summer chinook salmon and steelhead ESUs were significantly lower during the longer time period. This difference may be due to a period of dam building on the Snake River during the 1960s and 1970s. For 33 stocks and seven ESUs, the probability of extinction could be estimated. The estimates were generally low for all ESUs with the exception of Upper Columbia River spring chinook and Upper Willamette River steelhead. The probability of 90% decline could be estimated for all stocks. The mean probability of 90% decline in 50 years was highest for Upper Columbia River spring chinook (95% mean probability across all stocks within the ESU) and Lower Columbia River steelhead (80% mean probability).We estimated the effects of two different management actions on long-term growth rates for the ESUs. Harvest reductions offer a means to mitigate risks for ESUs that bear substantial harvest pressure, but they are unlikely to increase population growth rates enough to produce stable or increasing trends for all ESUs. Similarly, anticipated improvements to passage survival through the Snake and mainstem Columbia hydropower systems may be important, but add...

Characterizing Precipitation Variability and Trends in the World’s Mediterranean-Climate Areas

“…Large dams are also common among the rivers of the west coast of the United States, especially among the Sacramento-San Joaquin and the Columbia River drainage networks [30,31] (though both of these river systems obtain much of their discharge from mountainous areas that receive heavy winter snowfall). Large reservoirs are also found in the Murray-Darling basin, with its outlet on the southern coast of Australia southeast of Adelaide [32]. In some cases, small reservoirs are ubiquitous across the landscape [33].…”

Monitoring the Reproductive Success of Naturally Spawning Hatchery and Natural Spring Chinook Salmon in the Wenatchee River, 2008-2009 Progress Report.

“…Evaluating the relative reproductive success of hatchery produced salmon is therefore important for determining if the considerable investment society has made in hatchery supplementation programs is actually contributing to the recovery of salmon populations (Mobrand et al 2005). By directly quantifying the reproductive success of stray hatchery fish in the natural environment relative to that of fish from the natural population they stray in to, the viability of natural populations receiving stray hatchery fish can also be more accurately evaluated (McClure et al 2003). Similar problems exist for monitoring the effects of supplementation in other species (e.g., Jabbour et al 1997).…”

“…Accurately measuring the biological causes of variance in reproductive success is important not only for determining the benefits of conservation hatcheries, but also for evaluating the risks from fish that stray from 'production' type hatcheries. The presence of large numbers of hatchery fish on spawning grounds can obscure the status of natural populations because their reproductive success is unknown (McClure et al 2003), and may lead to reduced short and long-term natural productivity due to genetic deterioration of the natural population as a result of interbreeding between naturally produced fish and hatchery fish Ford 2002). By directly quantifying the reproductive success of hatchery fish in the natural environment relative to that of fish from the natural population, the viability of natural populations receiving hatchery fish can be more accurately evaluated.…”

Impact and Adaptation Responses of Okanagan River Sockeye Salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) to Climate Variation and Change Effects During Freshwater Migration: Stock Restoration and Fisheries Management Implications

“…Okanagan sockeye fit this pattern as they constitute the last persistent population of more than a dozen now extirpated salmon stocks that originated in Canadian portions of the Columbia River and its tributaries prior to its intensive development to meet hydroelectric power and irrigation needs (Slaney et al, 1996). The depressed state of Columbia River salmon stocks and associated listings of multiple populations under the United States Endangered Species Act (ESA) has promoted a massive effort to 're-engineer' the management of habitat, water supplies and the role of fish production facilities to facilitate the long-term restoration of these stocks (National Research Council, 1996;McClure et al, 2003). Similarly, in Canada, concerns on the part of the 'three party' Okanagan Basin Technical Working Group (COBTWG representing Fisheries and Oceans Canada, the Okanagan Nation Alliance, and BC Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection) have resulted in stock restoration efforts to rebuild Okanagan sockeye salmon to historic levels of abundance capable of supporting First Nations food, ceremonial and societal fisheries entitlements.…”