1989
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(89)90019-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A large scale, high resolution, automated system for rat sleep staging. I. Methodology and technical aspects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this purpose, we compared the effects of UCM765 to those of its class congener UCM793 (Rivara et al, 2007), which exhibits a nonselective MT 1 /MT 2 profile of agonistic activity (MT 1 , pKi ϭ 9.09; MT 2 , pKi ϭ 9.19). In these experiments, sleep parameters were measured between 6:00 and 9:00 P.M., a period during which several NREMS and REMS episodes occur (Ruigt et al, 1989).…”
Section: Selectivity Of Ucm765 For Mt 2 Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, we compared the effects of UCM765 to those of its class congener UCM793 (Rivara et al, 2007), which exhibits a nonselective MT 1 /MT 2 profile of agonistic activity (MT 1 , pKi ϭ 9.09; MT 2 , pKi ϭ 9.19). In these experiments, sleep parameters were measured between 6:00 and 9:00 P.M., a period during which several NREMS and REMS episodes occur (Ruigt et al, 1989).…”
Section: Selectivity Of Ucm765 For Mt 2 Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the feature extraction carried out by Schaltenbrand et al (1993) was based on the frequency domain of various bioelectrical signals (see Section 3.5 -Schaltenbrand's system) while the data preprocessing performed by Roberts and Tarassenko (1992) relied on analysis in the time domain of a single EEG channel (see Section 3.4 -Roberts' system). This diversity is also observed in non connectionist sleep staging system reviews (Hasan, 1985;Ruigt et al, 1989). Feature extraction is an important stage in development of any sleep-wake staging system and is an interesting 'delicate' subject of investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Despite numerous studies dedicated to the sleep process (Hasan, 1985;Ruigt et al, 1989;Borbely and Achermann, 1992), its real function remains unknown. The establishment of an hypnogram from electrophysiological records (electroencephalogram 'EEG', electrooculogram 'EOG', electromyogram 'EMG',...) is a highly time-consuming part of sleep experiments and highly subjective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our intention by scoring recorded epochs into five categories instead of three was to provide a finer frame for analyzing the level of cortical activation within W and NREM sleep following pharmacologically evoked SD. Scoring of S-W epochs into four or five categories has been used by various automated scoring systems (67,83) and in several other laboratories (12,63). Raw hypnograms were smoothed, i.e., every 32-s period was assigned to the dominant S-W stage (26).…”
Section: Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%