1994
DOI: 10.1016/0926-9851(94)90011-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A large scale geophysical survey in the archaeological site of Europos (northern Greece)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
7

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
37
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Th e standard mapping technique is suffi cient and successful in most routine fi eld applications (Tsokas et al, 1994). On the other hand, the use of a fi xed-array length throughout the fi eld survey hinders the interpretation of collected resistivity data in areas with more complex surface geology, as the current cannot penetrate to deeper levels in order to gain more depth information.…”
Section: Archeosciences Revue D'archéométrie Suppl 33 2009 P 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th e standard mapping technique is suffi cient and successful in most routine fi eld applications (Tsokas et al, 1994). On the other hand, the use of a fi xed-array length throughout the fi eld survey hinders the interpretation of collected resistivity data in areas with more complex surface geology, as the current cannot penetrate to deeper levels in order to gain more depth information.…”
Section: Archeosciences Revue D'archéométrie Suppl 33 2009 P 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…84-86), gravity techniques in the Great Pyramid of Cheops at Giza, Egypt (Kerisel, 1988), seismic and resistivity techniques at Sabine, Italy (Bernabini et al, 1989) and electrical resistivity tomography at the test site of ITABC-CNR in Rome (Piro et al, 2001). The diverse results of more conventional techniques, such as magnetics, resistivity, and GPR, have been reported elsewhere in Greece and Cyprus (Tsokas et al, 1994;Sarris, 1998;Sarris et al, 2001). Since the geophysical surveys at Kenchreai applied common techniques to new material with unusual preservation, sometimes in an experimental capacity, they have a special significance from a methodological point of view.…”
Section: Geophysical Prospectionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Further, the combination of geophysical methods offers high resolution, detecting features in the order of a few tens of centimetres depth and/or thickness to several metres. Resistivity methods, and more specifically electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), (Tsokas et al, 1994;Diamanti et al, 2005, Papadopoulos et al, 2007, Tsokas et al, 2008a, Tsourlos and Tsokas, 2011 and ground penetrating radar (GPR) (Savvaidis et al, 1999;Leucci, 2002;Piro et al, 2003;Linford, 2004;Tsokas et al, 2007) are two of the most popular methods for doing so.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%