2017
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.3536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A large multicenter study evaluating prognosis and chemosensitivity of metastatic colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability.

Abstract: 3536 Background: Deficient Mismatch Repair (dMMR) in colorectal cancers (CRC) represent 12% of all tumors. In non-metastatic CRC setting, dMMR are associated with good prognosis but also with resistance to adjuvant 5-FU chemotherapy. In metastatic CRC (mCRC) setting, dMMR is found in less than 5% and its influence on prognosis and treatment response is little known. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included all consecutive patients with dMMR mCRC treated between 2005 and 2015 in 17 centers. The K… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, stage II-III MSI CRC had a better prognosis than stage II-III MSS CRC. However, stage IV MSI CRC are associated with poor prognosis and chemoresistance, especially to 5FU-based chemotherapy [ 51 ]. Thus, the association of low LRP1 expression with MSI might explain the pejorative prognosis impact of low LRP1 expression on metastatic patients only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, stage II-III MSI CRC had a better prognosis than stage II-III MSS CRC. However, stage IV MSI CRC are associated with poor prognosis and chemoresistance, especially to 5FU-based chemotherapy [ 51 ]. Thus, the association of low LRP1 expression with MSI might explain the pejorative prognosis impact of low LRP1 expression on metastatic patients only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of MSI as a predictive marker with modern combination regimens, such as FOLFOX and FOLFIRI, has less evidence [ 87 89 ] , and although an MSI-H status was retrospectively shown to predict improved DFS with adjuvant irinotecan and 5-FU (IFL regimen) in the CALGB (Alliance) 89803 trial, these results were inconsistently demonstrated in other exploratory analyses [ 90 , 91 ] . In the metastatic setting, recent data suggest a greater activity of irinotecan in MSI-H mCRC and better outcomes in favor of bevacizumab treatment compared to anti-EGFRs [ 92 ] . Indeed, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is known to play a crucial role in tumor microenvironment immuno-modulation and anti-angiogenic treatment has been proposed as an effective modality to potentiate immunotherapy [ 93 ] .…”
Section: Brafmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In metastatic CRCs (mCRC), dMMR/MSI represents only around 3% to 5% of mCRCs and has been associated with poor prognosis and chemoresistance to standard treatment [9,10]. Nevertheless, recent series have reported prolonged overall survival in dMMR/MSI mCRC and a trend toward better outcomes of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) as compared with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR), but no difference according to chemotherapy regimen, i.e., irinotecan-based chemotherapy as compared with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy has been reported [11]. Finally, recent nonrandomized trials suggest high efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in chemoresistant dMMR/MSI metastatic tumors due to the high tumor mutational burden in these tumors, while the other predictor of response to ICI is the IHC labeling of the PD-L1 protein (programmed death-ligand 1) [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%