2020
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A large meta-analysis establishes the role of MRD negativity in long-term survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma

Abstract: The prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated in a large cohort of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) using a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Medline and EMBASE databases were searched for articles published up to 8 June 2019, with no date limit on the indexed database. Clinical end points stratified by MRD status (positive or negative) were extracted, including hazard ratios (HRs) on PFS and OS, P values, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

7
184
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(206 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
7
184
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study indicates for the first time to our knowledge that the outcome of NDMM patients with persistent BM MRD positivity at all assessments resembles that of primary refractory disease; in both circumstances, sequential intensive therapies failed to eradicate residual MRD clone(s). 8,9 Notably, at diagnosis the distribution of However, the prognosis of MRD positive patients is worse in the setting of higher stage of the disease (ISS stage) and high-risk disease (GEP 70) consistent with previous studies. 6 Recent reports indicate that phenotypic and genomic features of MRD tumor cells show the presence of therapy-induced clonal selection with overexpression of adhesion molecules, integrins and chemokine receptors conferring a survival advantage in the BM microenvironment.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…The current study indicates for the first time to our knowledge that the outcome of NDMM patients with persistent BM MRD positivity at all assessments resembles that of primary refractory disease; in both circumstances, sequential intensive therapies failed to eradicate residual MRD clone(s). 8,9 Notably, at diagnosis the distribution of However, the prognosis of MRD positive patients is worse in the setting of higher stage of the disease (ISS stage) and high-risk disease (GEP 70) consistent with previous studies. 6 Recent reports indicate that phenotypic and genomic features of MRD tumor cells show the presence of therapy-induced clonal selection with overexpression of adhesion molecules, integrins and chemokine receptors conferring a survival advantage in the BM microenvironment.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…The assessment of bone marrow measurable residual disease (MRD) has consistently shown a significant prognostic value in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), with a benefit in survival outcomes associated with MRD negativity surpassing the value of complete response [ 1 , 2 ]. Next-generation sequencing and Euroflow on bone marrow reach higher sensitivity than standard flow, increasing the predictive potential [ 3 , 4 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next-generation sequencing and Euroflow on bone marrow reach higher sensitivity than standard flow, increasing the predictive potential [ 3 , 4 ]. Thus, MRD was included in the consensus criteria for response [ 5 ] and its role as a surrogate marker for survival outcomes is under consideration [ 1 , 6 ]. Preliminary studies suggest that MRD dynamics could demonstrate greater prognostic value than just the MRD status at a single time point [ 7 , 8 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, with regard to the cytogenetic abnormalities and R-ISS stage, the bene t of maintenance therapy in PFS (Perrot et al, 2018). A large meta-analysis has con rmed the signi cance of MRD negativity as the most relevant surrogate marker not only for PFS but also for OS (Munshi et al, 2020). Taken together, these results suggest that the long-term outcome depends on the susceptibility of MM cells to any treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%