2010
DOI: 10.1038/ng.643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A large and complex structural polymorphism at 16p12.1 underlies microdeletion disease risk

Abstract: There is a complex relationship between the evolution of segmental duplications and rearrangements associated with human disease. We performed a detailed analysis of one region on chromosome 16p12.1 associated with neurocognitive disease and identified one of the largest structural inconsistencies with the human reference assembly. Various genomic analyses show that all examined humans are homozygously inverted relative to the reference genome for a 1.1-Mbp region on 16p12.1. We determined that this assembly d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
92
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
92
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…comparative sequencing studies of human genomic disorder breakpoint regions have reported increasing complexity in the human lineage as a predisposing factor to rearrangement associated with disease (Rochette et al 2001;Antonacci et al 2010;Boettger et al 2012). Our results show that loci of increasing complexity are present in other great ape lineages creating speciesspecific hotspots prone to deletion and disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…comparative sequencing studies of human genomic disorder breakpoint regions have reported increasing complexity in the human lineage as a predisposing factor to rearrangement associated with disease (Rochette et al 2001;Antonacci et al 2010;Boettger et al 2012). Our results show that loci of increasing complexity are present in other great ape lineages creating speciesspecific hotspots prone to deletion and disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…11). In total, the data are compelling that this particular interchromosomal core represents a preferential site of genomic instability, a property we have previously observed for core duplicons identified on 16p.12.1, 17q21.31, and 15q13.3 (LCR16a, LRRC37, GOLGA) (Zody et al 2008;Antonacci et al 2010Antonacci et al , 2014.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…2005), while the 16p11.2-12.2 region has seen a rapid integration of segmental duplications in the last 15 million years of hominoid evolution that contributed to a profound modification of these chromosomal bands (Johnson et al 2001;Antonacci et al 2010), putting them at risk for recurrent pathogenic rearrangements ( Fig. 1; Girirajan et al 2010;Walters et al 2010;Jacquemont et al 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%