Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems 2016
DOI: 10.5220/0005833804720481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Language for Defining and Detecting Interrelated Complex Changes on RDF(S) Knowledge Bases

Abstract: The dynamic nature of web data brings forward the need for maintaining data versions as well as identifying changes between them. In this paper, we deal with problems regarding understanding evolution, focusing on RDF(S) knowledge bases, as RDF is a de-facto standard for representing data on the web. We argue that revisiting past snapshots or the differences between them is not enough for understanding how and why data evolved. Instead, changes should be treated as first-class-citizens. In our view, this invol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All 34 documents that mention complex changes have at least one mention of complex change applied to classes. Almost half of the analyzed documents mentioned both changes applied to classes and to properties (Stojanovic et al , 2002; Klein, 2004; Rogozan and Paquette, 2005; Stuckenschmidt and Van Harmelen, 2005; Tang and Yang, 2007; Khattak et al , 2008; Najla et al , 2009; Rogozan and Paquette, 2009; Djedidi and Aufaure, 2010; Gröner et al , 2010; Kondylakis et al , 2010; Javed et al , 2012, 2013; Khattak et al , 2013; Papavasileiou et al , 2013; Rahnama and Barforoush, 2015; Mahfoudh et al , 2015; Djamel et al , 2015; Galani et al , 2015; and Herrmannsdoerfer et al , 2010). A small number of documents Klein (2004), Hartung et al (2010, 2013), Dos Reis et al (2013), Papavasileiou et al (2013), Dos Reis et al (2014), Dinh et al (2014), and Kondylakis et al (2010) mentioned changes applied to annotations.…”
Section: Critical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…All 34 documents that mention complex changes have at least one mention of complex change applied to classes. Almost half of the analyzed documents mentioned both changes applied to classes and to properties (Stojanovic et al , 2002; Klein, 2004; Rogozan and Paquette, 2005; Stuckenschmidt and Van Harmelen, 2005; Tang and Yang, 2007; Khattak et al , 2008; Najla et al , 2009; Rogozan and Paquette, 2009; Djedidi and Aufaure, 2010; Gröner et al , 2010; Kondylakis et al , 2010; Javed et al , 2012, 2013; Khattak et al , 2013; Papavasileiou et al , 2013; Rahnama and Barforoush, 2015; Mahfoudh et al , 2015; Djamel et al , 2015; Galani et al , 2015; and Herrmannsdoerfer et al , 2010). A small number of documents Klein (2004), Hartung et al (2010, 2013), Dos Reis et al (2013), Papavasileiou et al (2013), Dos Reis et al (2014), Dinh et al (2014), and Kondylakis et al (2010) mentioned changes applied to annotations.…”
Section: Critical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the set of 34 documents, only 8 documents Rahnama and Barforoush (2015), Xie et al (2011), Liu et al (2014), Hartung et al (2010), Mahfoudh et al (2015), Kondylakis et al (2010), Khelladi et al (2015), and Galani et al (2015) present some formalization about the changes they mention and 9 documents Rogozan and Paquette (2005), Najla et al (2009), Khattak et al (2008, 2013), Kirsten et al (2011), Maedche et al (2002), Palma et al (2009), Noy et al (2004), and Khattak et al (2013) do not present any textual description or formalization for the changes. In addition, even the 15 documents that present some textual description of the changes do not do so for all the mentioned changes.…”
Section: Critical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations