2004
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.144988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A landowner's guide for restoring and managing Oregon white oak habitats /

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings have further implications with respect to current oak savanna restoration efforts (Campbell 2004, Vesely & Tucker 2004. Clearly, the ultimate goal of many oak savanna restoration projects is to restore habitat for a broad complement of oak-associated wildlife species.…”
Section: Conservation Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings have further implications with respect to current oak savanna restoration efforts (Campbell 2004, Vesely & Tucker 2004. Clearly, the ultimate goal of many oak savanna restoration projects is to restore habitat for a broad complement of oak-associated wildlife species.…”
Section: Conservation Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In the last century, white oak savanna has declined to < 1% of its historic range while white oak woodlands have been reduced from an estimated 162,000 ha to <11,000 ha (Vesely & Tucker 2004, ODFW 2006.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The extensive degradation and loss of oak-dominated communities throughout the Puget Lowland and Willamette Valley adds urgency to efforts to restore these endangered systems (Hanna and Dunn 1996, Vesely and Tucker 2004, Vellend et al 2008. At many sites, oaks are witnessing considerable canopy die-back, alteration in form, and high rates of mortality due to competition for resources by fast-growing firs.…”
Section: Oak Release Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, mechanical removal of competing conifers is a feasible and effective approach for ensuring survival of canopy oaks (Vesely and Tucker 2004. Beginning in 2006, large numbers of Douglas-fir that were less than 20 cm dbh, and select trees less than 30 cm dbh within one tree height of targeted oaks, were cut from the stand.…”
Section: Oak Release Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%