1976
DOI: 10.3133/pp964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

31
1,964
2
74

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,167 publications
(2,071 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
31
1,964
2
74
Order By: Relevance
“…Agricultural land pushed to the north and northeast of the city, increasing by 28% from 48 km 2 in 1985 to 315 km 2 in 2015 ( Table 2). Accuracy assessment for LU/LC classification generated an overall accuracy ranging from 94% to 97% across all image years and Kappa Coefficient was >0.91; a satisfactory classification accuracy level of remotely sensed data for LU/LC [21]. User accuracy of individual classes ranged from 92% to 100%, and producer accuracy of individual classes ranged from 81% to 100% (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Agricultural land pushed to the north and northeast of the city, increasing by 28% from 48 km 2 in 1985 to 315 km 2 in 2015 ( Table 2). Accuracy assessment for LU/LC classification generated an overall accuracy ranging from 94% to 97% across all image years and Kappa Coefficient was >0.91; a satisfactory classification accuracy level of remotely sensed data for LU/LC [21]. User accuracy of individual classes ranged from 92% to 100%, and producer accuracy of individual classes ranged from 81% to 100% (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The land use/cover classification scheme by Anderson [21] was modified to account for local field knowledge and conditions of the study area to define four types of land cover including barren land, urban areas, agricultural land and water ( Table 1). The focus in this study is on agricultural land and urban area (water was determined to cover only 1%).…”
Section: Image Classification (Segmentation)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall accuracy and a Kappa analysis were used to perform a classification accuracy assessment based on error matrix analysis. A standard for land use maps was set between 85 (Anderson et al, 1976 andBektas, 2003) and 90 % overall accuracy.…”
Section: Accuracy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of area in each of the land cover classes found in the sighting location buffer polygons was then summarized by individual and further aggregated into classes found in the Anderson Level I Land Use classification scheme (Anderson et al, 1976). These land use classes included developed, forested, agriculture, and wetland ( Table 1).…”
Section: Land Use Associationsmentioning
confidence: 99%