2000
DOI: 10.1007/s002130050004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A lack of tolerance to the anxiolytic effects of diazepam on the plus-maze: comparison of male and female rats

Abstract: The findings from these experiments suggest that tolerance to the anxiolytic effects of DZ did not develop in males or females, and that the hormonal status of the animal does not significantly alter the anxiolytic effects of DZ following either acute or chronic exposure. Following plus-maze exposure, females had significantly higher corticosterone levels than males and acute DZ treatment diminished this stress response.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In rats receiving the control virus (DSGZ), diazepam administration did not significantly alter anxiety measures in the elevated plus maze (percent time spent in open arms, Figure 2; F(1,40) = 0.3, p=0.6 for diazepam effect), however, diazepam increased locomotor activity (number of closed arm entries, Figure 3), (F(1,40) =6.9, p<0.02). These results are similar to those reported earlier (Stock et al 2000;Kang et al 2000;Wilson et al 2004), in that these doses of diazepam produce marginal anxiolytic effects in male rats, with or without a lacZ (control) virus injection, under these test conditions. Naltrindole administration did not affect anxiety (F(1,40) = 0.3), or activity (F(1,40) = 0.01) measures in vehicle or diazepam-treated control (DSGZ) rats (p > 0.05).…”
Section: Experiments 1: Effect Of a Delta Opioid Antagonist On Enkephasupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In rats receiving the control virus (DSGZ), diazepam administration did not significantly alter anxiety measures in the elevated plus maze (percent time spent in open arms, Figure 2; F(1,40) = 0.3, p=0.6 for diazepam effect), however, diazepam increased locomotor activity (number of closed arm entries, Figure 3), (F(1,40) =6.9, p<0.02). These results are similar to those reported earlier (Stock et al 2000;Kang et al 2000;Wilson et al 2004), in that these doses of diazepam produce marginal anxiolytic effects in male rats, with or without a lacZ (control) virus injection, under these test conditions. Naltrindole administration did not affect anxiety (F(1,40) = 0.3), or activity (F(1,40) = 0.01) measures in vehicle or diazepam-treated control (DSGZ) rats (p > 0.05).…”
Section: Experiments 1: Effect Of a Delta Opioid Antagonist On Enkephasupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Drugs that increase the open arms exploration are considered anxiolytics and the reverse holds true for anxiogenic compounds (Handley and McBlane, 1993). In this study, diazepam was used as a positive control and, as expected, it increased the activity in the open arms of the elevated plus-maze apparatus, confirming its anxiolytic actions (Stock et al, 2000). Many benzodiazepines, and related compounds that bind to receptors in the central nervous system, have been already identified in certain plant extracts Medina and Marder, 1996;Viola et al, 1994Viola et al, , 1995.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Our pharmacological findings are supported by the Western blot data demonstrating almost undetectable levels of α4 expression in the CA1 hippocampus of diestrous female rats. Gender differences in both subunit composition and GABA pharmacology have been widely reported Stock et al, 2000;Yee et al, 2004), so this pharmacological difference is not surprising.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%