2020
DOI: 10.1111/nph.16496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A lack of genetically compatible mates constrains the spread of an invasive weed

Abstract: Introduced populations often experience lag times before invasion, but the mechanisms constraining rapid expansions of introduced populations are unclear. Solidago altissima is a North American native plant with highly invasive Japanese populations and introduced Australian populations that are not invasive despite the climatic and ecological suitability of the region.By contrasting Australian with Japanese populations, we tested the hypothesis that Australian population growth is limited by a lack of long-dis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(67 reference statements)
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it appears that both early and later generation hybrids are at least partially fertile in natural populations and that there is a higher frequency of backcrossing to C. maritima . The patterns of hybridization we identified is consistent with the hypothesis that mating among these cross‐compatible invaders has facilitated the establishment of the self‐incompatible C. maritima whose range expansion may otherwise be limited due to Allee effects, as has been observed in other potential self‐incompatible invaders (Uesugi et al, 2020). The evolutionary consequence of hybridization for both species remains unclear, as is its role, if any, in the rapid expansion of one invader at the expense of another.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Furthermore, it appears that both early and later generation hybrids are at least partially fertile in natural populations and that there is a higher frequency of backcrossing to C. maritima . The patterns of hybridization we identified is consistent with the hypothesis that mating among these cross‐compatible invaders has facilitated the establishment of the self‐incompatible C. maritima whose range expansion may otherwise be limited due to Allee effects, as has been observed in other potential self‐incompatible invaders (Uesugi et al, 2020). The evolutionary consequence of hybridization for both species remains unclear, as is its role, if any, in the rapid expansion of one invader at the expense of another.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Furthermore, it appears that both early and later generation hybrids are at least partially fertile in natural populations and that there is a higher frequency of backcrossing to C. maritima . The patterns of hybridization we identified is consistent with the hypothesis that mating among these cross-compatible invaders has facilitated the establishment of the self-incompatible C. maritima whose range expansion may otherwise be limited due to Allee effects, as has been observed in other potential selfincompatible invaders (Uesugi, Baker, de Silva, Nurkowski, & Hodgins, 2020). The demographic benefits to C. maritima of hybridization during range expansion have been assessed through simulations (Mesgaran, et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This may explain the relatively commonly observed mixed‐hybrid composition of invasive populations. Heterospecific siring advantage driven by the timing of pollination could have aided the initial establishment of C. maritima , whereby Allee effects commonly experienced in small SI populations (e.g., Uesugi et al, 2020) could have been overcome via mating with the already established C. edentula . As stated by Todesco and colleagues (2016), assessments of mating patterns in natural mixed populations will allow us to determine whether demographic rescue or genetic swamping is contributing to the replacement of C. edentula by C. maritima in Australia, a hypothesis that is consistent with our data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%