1978
DOI: 10.1080/03680770.1977.11896489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A laboratory experiment to examine the effects of nutrient enrichment on macrophyte and epiphyte growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Grazing rates may have been higher on periphyton than phytoplankton in the swamp, or phytoplankton may respond more rapidly to nutrient supply than periphyton in this system. While some studies indicate that nutrients stimulate periphyton more than phytoplankton (Eminson & Phillips, 1978;Kairsalo et al, 1985), others show that phytoplankton have a greater P/B and an increased response to eutrophication relative to periphyton (Kairsalo, 1980;Rosemarin & Gelin, 1978). Local differences in hydrologic regimes appear to be linked to the seasonal cycle of algae at different sites in the swamp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grazing rates may have been higher on periphyton than phytoplankton in the swamp, or phytoplankton may respond more rapidly to nutrient supply than periphyton in this system. While some studies indicate that nutrients stimulate periphyton more than phytoplankton (Eminson & Phillips, 1978;Kairsalo et al, 1985), others show that phytoplankton have a greater P/B and an increased response to eutrophication relative to periphyton (Kairsalo, 1980;Rosemarin & Gelin, 1978). Local differences in hydrologic regimes appear to be linked to the seasonal cycle of algae at different sites in the swamp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under these conditions it seems unlikely that competition for light would cause the loss of plant populations in such shallow lakes and the mechanism for their demise is probably more complex. Eminson and Phillips (1978) showed a reduction in growth of Najas marina with epiphyte growth at high nutrient concentrations in the laboratory, and postulated that at low nutrient concentrations rooted aquatic plants, which could obtain nutrients from the sediment, were able to prevent epiphytic growth by organic secretions. At higher nutrient levels when both phytoplankton and epiphytic growth was greater the combined effect of shading by these algae could reduce the plants' capability of producing algicidal secretions, reduce growth rate and eventually lead to the loss of the submerged plants.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1978). In controlled laboratory experiments, increased nutrient loading encourages periphyton growth (Eminson & Phillips 1978; Jones et al . 1999), and a negative relationship between periphyton abundance and plant performance has been shown, particularly for isoetid plants (Sand‐Jensen 1977; Sand‐Jensen & Søndergaard 1981; Sand‐Jensen & Borum 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%