A laboratory and clinical evaluation of three dental luting cements

Knibbs, P J; Walls, A.W.G.

doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.1989.tb01367.x

Cited by 18 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 13 publications

(9 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In this study, Meron (a glass polyalkenoate 63 (ionomer) cement) which included polyacrylic acid showed the significantly lowest solubility value than the other permanent cements. In other words, the solubility result of glass ionomer cement in this study corroborated those of previous studies 22,[36][37][38][39][40][41] . In an in vitro study, it was found that glass ionomer cement was more resistant to acidic erosion than polycarboxylate cement 42) .…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 82%

“…In an in vitro study, it was found that glass ionomer cement was more resistant to acidic erosion than polycarboxylate cement 42) . On the same issue about erosion, it was found in the present study that the percentage of solubility of polycarboxylate cement (3.989 ) was higher than that of glass ionomer cement (1.867 ) at pH 7 after 28 days, which corroborated reported findings that the solubility of polycarboxylate cement in water was relatively weaker 39,43) . With zinc phosphate cement, Mesu and Reedijk 36) stated that its biggest disadvantage was its greater solubility in the presence of organic acids of oral secretions.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 81%

“…In many studies concerning glass ionomer cement, it was reported that this material was more resistant to solubility than zinc phosphate cement 22,[36][37][38][39][40] . In a review and comparison of presently used dental cements, Oilo 41) further found that glass ionomer cement had the highest strength and retentive properties and a low solubility 41) .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Evaluation of the Solubility of Dental Cements in Artificial Saliva of Different pH Values

Yanıkoğlu

Duymuş

2007

Dent. Mater. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to determine the solubility of dental cements in artificial saliva of different pH values. A total of 180 specimens-20 specimens (20 mm diameter×1.5 mm thickness) for each dental cement-were prepared. After the specimens were weighed, they were set in the media with different pH values. After 24 hours, 72 hours, seven days, and 28 days, the specimens were taken out, dried in a desiccator, and re-weighed. Percentage of solubility at each time period was calculated as 100 per cent times weight loss divided by the initial weight of the specimen.Analysis of variance and LSD multiple comparison test were applied. It was found that cement type, storage time, and medium pH exerted statistically significant (p<0.001) effects on solubility. Among the tested cement types, zinc phosphate cement (Adhesor Carbofine) presented the highest solubility. In terms of medium pH, the cements seemed to be most stable in the medium with pH 7.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 82%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 81%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evaluation of the Solubility of Dental Cements in Artificial Saliva of Different pH Values

Yanıkoğlu

Duymuş

2007

Dent. Mater. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…7 However, clinical studies have failed to show any superiority of glass ionomer cements over zinc phosphate cements. 6,[8][9][10] Indeed, it was the development of dentin adhesives that revolutionized not only the world of direct restorations, but also that of indirect restorations. Adhesive bonding of restorations via a resin cement allowed new types of materials to be used for toothcolored and/or tooth-preserving restorations (eg, allceramic veneers and crowns, resin composite inlays/ onlays, resin-bonded bridges).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bonding of Restorative Materials to Dentin With Various Luting Agents

Peutzfeldt¹,

Sahafi²,

Flury³

2011

Operative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Clinical RelevanceLuting agents have significant effects when used to bond indirect restorative materials to dentin. In the present study, resin cements performed better than water-based cements, especially self-etch and one of two self-adhesive resin cements. SUMMARYThe aim was to compare eight types of luting agents when used to bond six indirect, laboratory restorative materials to dentin. cements]). After water storage at 378C for one week, the shear bond strength of the specimens (n¼8/group) was measured, and the fracture mode was stereomicroscopically examined. Bond strength data were analyzed with two-factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Newman-Keuls' Multiple Range Test (a¼0.05). Both the restorative material and the luting agent had a significant effect on bond strength, and significant interaction was noted between the two variables. Zinc phosphate cement and glass ionomer cements produced the lowest bond strengths, whereas the highest bond strengths were found with the two self-etch and one of the self-adhesive resin cements. Generally, the fracture mode varied markedly with the restorative material. The luting agents had a bigger influence on bond strength between restorative materials and dentin than was seen with the restorative material.

show abstract

“…2,[5][6][7]11 Modifying powder/liquid ratio can have a dramatic effect on solubility. 25,35 This may explain reports of poor clinical performance of polycarboxylate cement, despite of relatively good performance in laboratory tests. Polycarboxylate cement material is thyrotrophic; i.e.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 90%

Influence of pH and storage time on sorption and solubility behaviour of carboxylate and resin cements

Bayındır

Çolak

Yanıkoğlu

2010

Materials Research Innovations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to determine whether pH and storage time have any influence on the sorption and solubility behaviour of carboxylate and resin cements. Disc shaped specimens with a size of 1560?5 mm were prepared according to the specifications of each manufacturer and desiccated to a constant mass. A total of 80 specimens were prepared and divided into four groups (20 specimens for each cement). The specimens were stored in artificial saliva that has different pH values of 4, 5?5 and 7 at 37uC for 3 months. After 24, 48 h and 7, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90 days consecutively, the specimens were taken out of the distilled water and dried in a desiccator for 30 min to reweigh. The weight changes of these specimens after water immersion were measured using an electronic analytical balance and adjusted according to the water solubility measured at the same time. The difference between the first and second measurements was recorded as the total amount of material removed. The results were analysed by univariate ANOVA and Duncan's test at p,0?05. It was detected that the type of the cement and storage time are statistically significant (p,0?001). However, storage media were not statistically significant. Results show that the resin luting cement (Panavia F) had significantly less water sorption than the other luting cements evaluated. There were significant differences among the materials (p,0?001).

show abstract

A laboratory and clinical evaluation of three dental luting cements

Cited by 18 publications

References 13 publications

Evaluation of the Solubility of Dental Cements in Artificial Saliva of Different pH Values

Evaluation of the Solubility of Dental Cements in Artificial Saliva of Different pH Values

Bonding of Restorative Materials to Dentin With Various Luting Agents

Influence of pH and storage time on sorption and solubility behaviour of carboxylate and resin cements

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About