1982
DOI: 10.1016/s0163-4453(82)92563-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A laboratory-acquired infection with Neisseria meningitidis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Permanent sequelae are common among college students surviving meningococcal infection (95). There have been numerous reports of laboratory-acquired meningococcal infection, mostly among microbiologists manipulating the organism on an open laboratory bench (27,61,62,258,267).…”
Section: Risk Factors For Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Permanent sequelae are common among college students surviving meningococcal infection (95). There have been numerous reports of laboratory-acquired meningococcal infection, mostly among microbiologists manipulating the organism on an open laboratory bench (27,61,62,258,267).…”
Section: Risk Factors For Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reports of cases of invasive disease caused by Neisseria meningitidis infection acquired in the laboratory setting have appeared in the literature for many years (1,3,13,(15)(16)(17)20). However, a systematic evaluation of the risk of meningococcal disease among clinical microbiologists and an assessment of the potential laboratory procedures that might predispose technicians to infection have not previously been undertaken.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunoblot analysis with MPI also displayed the epidemiological usefulness of monoclonal antibodies. This was with strain DRES 30-A which had been isolated from an individual infected while working with SP3428, SP3428-P, and SP3428-NP (1). The piliation of DRES 30-A was identical to that of SP3428, implicating this as the infecting strain rather than SP3428-P or SP3428-NP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%