2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.09.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A label-free multi-functionalized graphene oxide based electrochemiluminscence immunosensor for ultrasensitive and rapid detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seawater and seafood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its reproducibility capacity plays an extremely important role in practical application for a biosensor. With this device, the relative standard deviation (RSD) toward the target DNA concentration of 4.33% (n = 6) was an excellent result in terms of the reproducibility and precision of the optimized DNA biosensor and compares well with other attempts such as that of Sha et al ( 2016 ) who reported RSD measurements of 7.8%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Its reproducibility capacity plays an extremely important role in practical application for a biosensor. With this device, the relative standard deviation (RSD) toward the target DNA concentration of 4.33% (n = 6) was an excellent result in terms of the reproducibility and precision of the optimized DNA biosensor and compares well with other attempts such as that of Sha et al ( 2016 ) who reported RSD measurements of 7.8%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Although most conventional DNA-based biosensors have the advantage of high selectivity due to the unique structure of the probe DNA, the complicated preparation process and the low electrochemical signal intensity discourage many attempts at practical application (Wang et al 2016 ). Additionally, many efforts suffer from one or more other drawbacks including long analytical time, high analytical costs and expensive instrumentation (Sha et al 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most frequent bacterial targets for biosensors are foodborne pathogens including Escherichia coli [13,14,15], Salmonella enterica [16,17,18], Listeria monocytogenes [19] and Vibrio parahaemolyticus [20]. The EIS biosensors for bacteria provide typical limits of detection (LODs) of 10 2 -10 4 CFU mL À 1 (colony-forming units) with no pre-enrichment and analysis time around 1-2 hours [19,21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various approaches have been developed to obtain better performances of VP analysis, including enzyme-linked immunesorbent assay (ELISA), [8][9][10] DNA probe, 11 most probable number (MPN), 12,13 polymerase chain reaction (PCR), [14][15][16][17][18] loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), [19][20][21][22][23] and electrochemistry (EC). 24,25 Despite each of these new approaches having a combination of excellent sensitivity, accuracy and specificity, they still suffer drawbacks involving high analytical cost, need for expensive equipment, and professional trained personnel. Therefore, simple, rapid, sensitive and low-cost assays for determining VP are urgently needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%