2014
DOI: 10.1364/oe.22.003860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A L_0 sparse analysis prior for blind poissonian image deconvolution

Abstract: This paper proposes a new approach for blindly deconvolving images that are contaminated by Poisson noise. The proposed approach incorporates a new prior, that is the L0 sparse analysis prior, together with the total variation constraint into the maximum a posteriori (MAP) framework for deconvolution. A greedy analysis pursuit numerical scheme is exploited to solve the L0 regularized MAP problem. Experimental results show that our approach not only produces smooth results substantially suppressing artifacts an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this purpose, in the case of Gaussian noise we have selected the methods proposed by Cuesta et al [38], fractional-order total variation using proximity algorithm (FTV-PA) [57], R-NL [58], Adaptive Regularization with the Structure Tensor [59]., the full fractional anisotropic diffusion (FFAD) [60] and overlapping group sparsity (OLGS) [40] for comparative analysis. For the case of Poisson noise, comparison is performed with the methods such as fourth-order partial differential equation filter (FOPDEF) [12], TV-Poi [61], OGS-ADM [62], Framelet based (BPID-FR) [63], spatially adaptive (RLSATV) [64] and sparse based (TV-L0) [65]. The work of TV-Poi and OGS-ADM is based on the TV and overlapping group sparsity based prior for Poisson noise image deblurring.…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, in the case of Gaussian noise we have selected the methods proposed by Cuesta et al [38], fractional-order total variation using proximity algorithm (FTV-PA) [57], R-NL [58], Adaptive Regularization with the Structure Tensor [59]., the full fractional anisotropic diffusion (FFAD) [60] and overlapping group sparsity (OLGS) [40] for comparative analysis. For the case of Poisson noise, comparison is performed with the methods such as fourth-order partial differential equation filter (FOPDEF) [12], TV-Poi [61], OGS-ADM [62], Framelet based (BPID-FR) [63], spatially adaptive (RLSATV) [64] and sparse based (TV-L0) [65]. The work of TV-Poi and OGS-ADM is based on the TV and overlapping group sparsity based prior for Poisson noise image deblurring.…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the properties of optical blur, some works introduced priors or assumptions in the blind method to estimate optical blur kernel [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. However, the optical blur is spatially varying, so some fields of the blurred image may not have sufficient information to estimate the PSFs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xu et al 21 adopted L0-norm for image smoothing which can be used as a fundamental tool for edge enhancement, removal of clip-art compression artifacts, and detail magnification. Gong et al 22 used the L0-norm of the wavelet to construct a sparse regularization term for restoring Poisson-blurred images. Xu et al 23 proposed a blind image deconvolution method using a piecewise function to approximate the L0-norm, effectively modeling the distribution of image gradients and achieving excellent results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%