2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2020.06.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A knowledge-based Query Tree with Shortcutting and Couple-Resolution for RFID tag identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our designed simulator was validated by Equations (3)-(6) in our previous works [21][22][23][24], which demonstrated the mathematical analysis results match the simulation results of our designed RFID simulator very well. The simulator adopted in this study is extended by simulator developed by our previous works [21][22][23][24]. To ensure the experiments were simulated in a verisimilar environment, we derived the corresponding numerical analysis model in Ref.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our designed simulator was validated by Equations (3)-(6) in our previous works [21][22][23][24], which demonstrated the mathematical analysis results match the simulation results of our designed RFID simulator very well. The simulator adopted in this study is extended by simulator developed by our previous works [21][22][23][24]. To ensure the experiments were simulated in a verisimilar environment, we derived the corresponding numerical analysis model in Ref.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Our designed simulator was validated by Equations (3)-(6) in our previous works [21][22][23][24], which demonstrated the mathematical analysis results match the simulation results of our designed RFID simulator very well. As shown in Figure 13, the rate of the conveyor belt was one meter per second (1 m/s), and measurements were in units of 0.5 m. The performance of SAC and MABT in terms of MAD (mean absolute deviation), MSE (mean square error), and MAPE (mean absolute percent error) are also demonstrated in Figure 13.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations