2000
DOI: 10.1080/10942910009524613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A knowledge base for the apparent mass diffusion coefficient (DEFF) of foods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
29
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
11
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As it can be observed, the magnitude order of the estimated diffusion coefficients was between 10 −11 and 10 −10 m 2 ·s −1 , which coincides with previous data [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Varzakas et al [5] compiled effective diffusion coefficients in magnitude orders between 10 −12 and 10 −10 m 2 ·s −1 for a wide variety of solid foods, and so did Doulia et al [19]. Diffusion through solids is more complex than diffusion through gases or liquids, that is why, in most cases, smaller diffusion coefficients are observed, and, therefore, mass transfer occurs more slowly.…”
Section: Estimation Of Effective Diffusion Coefficientssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…As it can be observed, the magnitude order of the estimated diffusion coefficients was between 10 −11 and 10 −10 m 2 ·s −1 , which coincides with previous data [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Varzakas et al [5] compiled effective diffusion coefficients in magnitude orders between 10 −12 and 10 −10 m 2 ·s −1 for a wide variety of solid foods, and so did Doulia et al [19]. Diffusion through solids is more complex than diffusion through gases or liquids, that is why, in most cases, smaller diffusion coefficients are observed, and, therefore, mass transfer occurs more slowly.…”
Section: Estimation Of Effective Diffusion Coefficientssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…For this study, Deff values varied between 5.51 x 10-12 -3.379 x 10-11m 2 /s. These values were observed to be within the general range of 0.8 x 10-13 -64.6 x 10-10m 2 /s for drying of food materials (Doulia et al, 2000;Sacilik et al, 2006).…”
Section: Estimation Of Effective Diffusivity and Activation Energymentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In fact, even considering cheese as a food matrix with saline solution occluded in the pores, parameters such as porosity, tortuosity and phase ratios are not sufficient to describe the mass transfer process accurately. Some typical pitfalls with the Fickian approach in foods were reported by Doulia et al [21]:…”
Section: Drawbacks Of the Fickian Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%