2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0032-9592(01)00310-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A kinetic study of the anaerobic digestion of ice-cream wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
57
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
57
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A laboratory-scale experiment analysed the kinetic performance of anaerobic synthetic ice-cream effl uent at 37 °C applying the Monod and Contois equations at an HRT range between 2.99 and 7.45 days. A bett er explanation of the kinetic coeffi cients can be achieved in the fi nal pilot-scale plant since it allows variations in the initial substrate concentration (97).…”
Section: Biological Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A laboratory-scale experiment analysed the kinetic performance of anaerobic synthetic ice-cream effl uent at 37 °C applying the Monod and Contois equations at an HRT range between 2.99 and 7.45 days. A bett er explanation of the kinetic coeffi cients can be achieved in the fi nal pilot-scale plant since it allows variations in the initial substrate concentration (97).…”
Section: Biological Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bal & Dhagat (2001) points out that the anaerobic process is more advantageous than the aerobic process in organic waste treatment because of the high degree of waste stabilization, low production of excess biological sludge, low nutrient requirement and production of methane gas as a useful byproduct. Several studies have been carried out for evaluating kinetic parameters and model equations for anaerobic digestion by Siles et al (2010), Borja et al (2005), Jimenez et al (2004), Raposo et al (2009), Rincon et al (2009) and Hu et al (2002); these are all based on the Monod kinetic model (Monod 1950) and on the revised kinetic model developed by Chen et al (1980) and Hashimoto et al (1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anaerobic digestion has severally been reported as a successful bioprocess treating various organic wastewaters and subsequently generating biogas [7][8][9][10][11][12]. However, the biological mechanism of anaerobic digestion is not well understood due to the complexity of the bacterial community structure and bioconversion [13]. Hu et al asserted that process modeling is a good tool for predicting and describing the performance of biological processes [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the biological mechanism of anaerobic digestion is not well understood due to the complexity of the bacterial community structure and bioconversion [13]. Hu et al asserted that process modeling is a good tool for predicting and describing the performance of biological processes [13]. Other reports also confirmed that process modeling based on previously acquired data is one technical route to enhancing the performance of anaerobic processes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%