1976
DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.71.8.1493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A kinetic study of the dissolution of uraninite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
84
2

Year Published

1980
1980
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
84
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The reaction order with respect to O 2 is 1 in the kinetic treatment while the proposed mechanism implies a reaction order of 0.5. It should be noted that there are experimental studies showing a reaction order of 1 as well as 0.5 with respect to O 2 [38,[48][49][50]. In general, the reaction order decreases with increasing O 2 concentration [50].…”
Section: Oxidation Of Uo 2 (S)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reaction order with respect to O 2 is 1 in the kinetic treatment while the proposed mechanism implies a reaction order of 0.5. It should be noted that there are experimental studies showing a reaction order of 1 as well as 0.5 with respect to O 2 [38,[48][49][50]. In general, the reaction order decreases with increasing O 2 concentration [50].…”
Section: Oxidation Of Uo 2 (S)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oxidative UO 2 dissolution rates under various conditions have been reported in numerous publications [4,5,7,9,10,13,14,[21][22][23][30][31][32][33][34][35]44,48,50,53,54]. The studies considered here were all performed at room [7,10,34,44].…”
Section: Dissolution Of Oxidized Uo 2 (S)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Much information has recentiy come to light pertaining to the nature of mechanisms and rate laws (See for example Aagaard and Helgeson, 1982;Bemer, 1978Bemer, ,1980Bemer, ,1981Bemer and Holdren, 1979;Blum and Lasaga, 1991;CarrollWebb and Walther, 1988;WoUast, 1984,1985;Holdren and Bemer, 1979; Fun-er and Grandstaff, 1976Grandstaff, ,1977Grandstaff, , 1978; Helgeson, Murphy, and Aagaard., 1984;Wolery, 1986,1988;Lasaga, 1981ab;Murphy andHelgeson, 1987,1989;PeO:ovich, 1976; Petrovich, Bemer, and Goldhaber., 1976;Rimstidt and Barnes, 1980;Schott, Bemer, and Sjoberg, 1981;Tahnan and Nesbitt, 1988;WoUast and Chou, 1985;Wood and Walther, 1983;Zinder, Furrer, and Stumm, 1986). Kinetic reaction path modeling has only become a possibility due to the recent availability of quantitative descriptions of the rates of some geochemically important reactions.…”
Section: Reaction Pathsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in the release was quantified as a function of increasing bicarbonate concentration. Bicarbonate-promoted dissolution has been observed with numerous uranium minerals including uranophane (Casas et al 1997b;Perez et al 2000), soddyite (Perez et al 1997;Casas et al 1997b), uraninite (Casas et al 1998;Casas et al 1994;Pierce et al 2005;Grandstaff 1976;de Pablo et al 1999), becquerelite (Casas et al 1997a;Sowder et al 2000b;Hering and Schnoor 2000), and autunite-group minerals (Sowder et al 2000b). Casas et al (Perez et al 2000;Casas et al 1997b) quantified the solubility of uranophane through a series of static tests and provide a solubility constant of log K o so = 11.7 ± 0.6.…”
Section: Dissolution Kinetics Of Uranophanementioning
confidence: 99%