1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf00263202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A kinetic study of the decomposition of benzoyl peroxide assisted by Lewis acids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar test of the WEP for GWs using line of sight Shapiro delay from a GRB, which simultaneously emits GWs and photons was first proposed by Sivaram [31]. All previous detections by LIGO [32][33][34][35] were binary black hole mergers, for which no EM counterparts are expected (See, however [36].)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…A similar test of the WEP for GWs using line of sight Shapiro delay from a GRB, which simultaneously emits GWs and photons was first proposed by Sivaram [31]. All previous detections by LIGO [32][33][34][35] were binary black hole mergers, for which no EM counterparts are expected (See, however [36].)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In the framework of parameterized post-Newtonian approximation, deviations from EEP can be described by a parameter γ, which is 1 in general relativity. Therefore, the GW/GRB association is very suitable to test the EEP violation (Sivaram 1999;Wu et al 2016;Li et al 2016a). The Shapiro delay is generally calculated as ∆t gra = − ∆γ c 3 r e r o U(r(t); t) (Shapiro 1964;Krauss & Tremaine 1988;Longo 1988), where the integral is along the travelling path of photons and U(r(t); t) is the gravitational potential.…”
Section: Testing the Einstein Equivalence Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of GW observations, the identification of macronova/kilonova signals in the afterglow of a few short/long-short GRBs provides the strongest support to their compact object merger origin (see Jin et al 2016, and the references therein). The GW/GRB/macronova association provides a wealth of physical information about the source(s) and allows novel tests of fundamental physics (e.g., Sivaram 1999;Del Pozzo et al 2013;Li et al 2016;Miller 2016;Wu et al 2016;Paschalidis 2017), as demonstrated in the case of GW170817/GRB 170817A/AT2017gfo (e.g., Abbott et al 2017c;Wang et al 2017). Moreover, with the increasing sensitivities of the LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA detectors, the number of events will accumulate considerably in the next few years, reliable statistical studies will become possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%