2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2011.12.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A kinetic model for the oxidative coupling of methane over Na2WO4/Mn/SiO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, it has been determined that the selectivity has increased 2–3 times. It is known that increasing GHSV generally decreases methane conversion but increases C 2 selectivity [22–24] . When the oxygen conversions were investigated it was observed that at lower space velocity the conversions were not complete even at 600 °C but they were complete at higher space velocity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, it has been determined that the selectivity has increased 2–3 times. It is known that increasing GHSV generally decreases methane conversion but increases C 2 selectivity [22–24] . When the oxygen conversions were investigated it was observed that at lower space velocity the conversions were not complete even at 600 °C but they were complete at higher space velocity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is known that increasing GHSV generally decreases methane conversion but increases C 2 selectivity. [22][23][24] When the oxygen conversions were investigated it was observed that at lower space velocity the conversions were not complete even at 600°C but they were complete at higher space velocity. Thus, at a lower GHSV value, mass transfer limitation for oxygen caused a decrease in methane conversion and in turn lowered the activity and selectivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 Diluting the reactant mixture decreases the partial pressures of methane and O 2 and thus improves the selectivity for coupled C 2+ hydrocarbons while suppressing the formation of CO and CO 2 . 39,44,45 This change in the OCM results was more signicant at the higher temperatures of 800-850 C (with CH 4 conversions > 20%) and less signicant at 750 C (with CH 4 conversions < 20%). When the feed was highly diluted at the low reaction temperature, the formed methyl radicals may not be able to undergo gas-phase coupling with other methyl radicals in the highly diluted environment, which may reduce the C 2+ selectivity.…”
Section: Catalytic Activity Measurementmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Although OCM can increase biogas fuel quality, the presence of H 2 S in the raw biogas feed results in significant catalyst poisoning. OCM involves three steps, namely (i) the activation of CH 4 by O 2 species adsorbed on the catalyst surface to prepare CH 3 · radicals, (ii) gas‐phase coupling of CH 3 ·radicals to form paraffins, and (iii) dehydrogenation of C 2+ paraffins to olefins 20–26 . Steps (i) and (iii) are confined to the catalyst surface and may involve the binding of sulfur (S) species to catalytically active sites, which suppresses the formation of CH 3 · radicals and olefins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%