2002
DOI: 10.1126/science.1076164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Kinetic Framework for a Mammalian RNA Polymerase in Vivo

Abstract: We have analyzed the kinetics of assembly and elongation of the mammalian RNA polymerase I complex on endogenous ribosomal genes in the nuclei of living cells with the use of in vivo microscopy. We show that components of the RNA polymerase I machinery are brought to ribosomal genes as distinct subunits and that assembly occurs via metastable intermediates. With the use of computational modeling of imaging data, we have determined the in vivo elongation time of the polymerase, and measurements of recruitment a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
361
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 394 publications
(388 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
23
361
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This reactive patch specifies the maximal rotational shift of the binding sites of two particles at close distance, at which a productive hit can occur (Vijayakumar et al, 1998). As discussed above, the reactive patch value of 3°used for the simulations presented yielded association rates that match well with known association rates among protein binding partners as well as productive hit rates for RNA polymerase I interactions with its transcriptional target, rDNA (Schreiber and Fersht, 1996;Dundr et al, 2002). However, it is possible that the actual reactive patches on snRNPs are smaller or larger than those estimated here.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 48%
“…This reactive patch specifies the maximal rotational shift of the binding sites of two particles at close distance, at which a productive hit can occur (Vijayakumar et al, 1998). As discussed above, the reactive patch value of 3°used for the simulations presented yielded association rates that match well with known association rates among protein binding partners as well as productive hit rates for RNA polymerase I interactions with its transcriptional target, rDNA (Schreiber and Fersht, 1996;Dundr et al, 2002). However, it is possible that the actual reactive patches on snRNPs are smaller or larger than those estimated here.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 48%
“…27 For FRAP, 1-2 pulses at full laser power were applied to a bleaching ROI encompassing the entire WPB, and the WPB FI followed to monitor recovery. For whole-cell inverse FRAP (iFRAP 28 ) a PL APO 63 ϫ 0.6-1.4NA objective was used to image at least 2 fluorescent cells at a time. All but a small region of 1 cell (containing a few WPBs) was bleached using full laser power pulses at 1-to 2-second intervals over an ϳ 5-minute period.…”
Section: Whole-wpb Fluorescence Recovery Analysis Of Rabs and Effectomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All iFRAP data were corrected and normalized using the equation described in Dundr et al (2002) (also see Supplemental Material). iFRAP curves were modeled equally well with a two-phase exponential decay equation (Supplemental Figure 1).…”
Section: Inverse Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching Analysis mentioning
confidence: 99%