2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05390-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A kilonova following a long-duration gamma-ray burst at 350 Mpc

Abstract: Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are divided into two populations [1, 2]; long GRBs that derive from the core-collapse of massive stars [e.g., 3] and short GRBs that form in the merger of two compact objects [4]. While it is common to divide the two populations at a γ-ray duration of two seconds, classification based on duration does not always cleanly map to the progenitor. This is notable in the form of GRBs with bright,

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

13
126
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 154 publications
(81 reference statements)
13
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The light curve of prompt emission is composed of an initial hard-main emission (with a duration ∼13 s) followed by a series of soft gamma-ray extended emission with a duration ∼55 s, and the structure of the light curve is similar to the particularly interesting case GRB 060614 (Xiao & Zhang 2022;Yang & Zhang 2022) and GRB 211227A (Lü et al 2022). More interestingly, no associated supernova signature is detected for GRB 211211A, even down to very stringent limits at such a low redshift, but associated with kilonova is observed by several optical telescopes (Rastinejad et al 2022). That observed evidence suggests that GRB 211211A originated from a binary compact star merger (Gompertz et al 2022;Rastinejad et al 2022;Xiao & Zhang 2022;Yang & Zhang 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The light curve of prompt emission is composed of an initial hard-main emission (with a duration ∼13 s) followed by a series of soft gamma-ray extended emission with a duration ∼55 s, and the structure of the light curve is similar to the particularly interesting case GRB 060614 (Xiao & Zhang 2022;Yang & Zhang 2022) and GRB 211227A (Lü et al 2022). More interestingly, no associated supernova signature is detected for GRB 211211A, even down to very stringent limits at such a low redshift, but associated with kilonova is observed by several optical telescopes (Rastinejad et al 2022). That observed evidence suggests that GRB 211211A originated from a binary compact star merger (Gompertz et al 2022;Rastinejad et al 2022;Xiao & Zhang 2022;Yang & Zhang 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…More interestingly, no associated supernova signature is detected for GRB 211211A, even down to very stringent limits at such a low redshift, but associated with kilonova is observed by several optical telescopes (Rastinejad et al 2022). That observed evidence suggests that GRB 211211A originated from a binary compact star merger (Gompertz et al 2022;Rastinejad et al 2022;Xiao & Zhang 2022;Yang & Zhang 2022). However, how to produce such long-duration emission within the compact star merger scenario remains an open question.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, except for AT2017gfo, other kilonova candidates were all detected in superposition with decaying sGRB afterglows (e.g., Berger et al 2013;Fan et al 2013;Tanvir et al 2013;Gao et al 2015Gao et al , 2017Jin et al 2015Jin et al , 2016Jin et al , 2020Yang et al 2015;Gompertz et al 2018;Ascenzi et al 2019;Rossi et al 2020;Fong et al 2021;Ma et al 2021;Wu et al 2021;Yuan et al 2021). Interestingly, a bright kilonova candidate was recently found to be associated with a longduration GRB 211211A (e.g., Rastinejad et al 2022;Troja et al 2022;Yang et al 2022b;Zhu et al 2022a). One possible reason why almost all kilonova candidates were detected in GRB afterglows is that most BNS and NSBH mergers are far away from us.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent discoveries of short GRBs (GRB 200826A, GRB 211227A) from the collapse of massive stars (Ahumada et al 2021;Lü et al 2022) and a long GRB (GRB 211211A) from binary mergers (Rastinejad et al 2022) challenge our understanding about the progenitor systems of GRBs. In this section, we examine the possible progenitors of GRB 201015A and GRB 201216C.…”
Section: Progenitors Of Grb 201015a and Grb 201216cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, SGRBs are believed to originate from the merging of compact binaries like two neutron stars or a neutron star and a black hole (Perna & Belczynski 2002;Abbott et al 2017). However, recent discoveries of a few GRBs exhibiting hybrid properties from the collapse of massive stars (Ahumada et al 2021) as well as from binary mergers (Rastinejad et al 2022;Troja et al 2022) challenge current understanding and provide valuable clues about the physical nature of progenitors of GRBs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%