1945
DOI: 10.1093/aesa/38.2.168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Key to the New World Genera of Libellulidae1 (Odonata)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
6

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For taxonomic identification, we used specialized keys (Borror ; Belle , ; Garrison ; Lencioni , ; Garrison et al . , ) and compared museum specimens with collection vouchers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For taxonomic identification, we used specialized keys (Borror ; Belle , ; Garrison ; Lencioni , ; Garrison et al . , ) and compared museum specimens with collection vouchers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sampling was based on the scanning method with fixed areas (De Marco Junior, 1998), already used in other studies (Reis et al, 2011;Juen and De Marco Junior, 2011;Silva-Pinto et al, 2012). For the identification of collected specimens at species level, systematic keys were used (Borror, 1945;Costa et al, 2002;Garrison et al, 2006;Heckman, 2006Heckman, , 2008Lencioni, 2006).…”
Section: Community Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although morphologically and behaviorally similar to Libellula, the genus Orthemis differs from Libellula in characters of wing venation arrangement (Kirby, 1887;Borror, 1945;Needham and Westfall, 1955;Dunkle, 1989). Given the indecisiveness of the molecular data about an ingroup vs an outgroup position for O. ferruginea with respect to Libellula, we suggest that the weight of the evidence (supplied by the morphological data) favors the current null hypothesis of Libellula monophyly and a corresponding outgroup position for O. ferruginea (e.g., Fig.…”
Section: Monophyly Of Libellulamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Needham (1897) assigned these taxa full generic status, and this interpretation has been widely adopted since (Needham and Westfall, 1955;Carle, 1978;May, 1992;Schmidt, 1987;Westfall and Tennennsen, 1996;Steinmann, 1997). Several other authors, however, have suggested that these two groups be assigned subgeneric status (Kennedy 1922a,b;Borror, 1945;Bennefield, 1965;Walker and Corbet, 1975;Allen et al, 1985;Tsuda, 1986). Still other authors have concluded that Ladona and Plathemis do not deserve even subgeneric status and have synonymized them under Libellula s.l.…”
Section: Status Of Libellula Ladona and Plathemismentioning
confidence: 99%