2010
DOI: 10.1086/650727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Key Ecological Trait Drove the Evolution of Biparental Care and Monogamy in an Amphibian

Abstract: Linking specific ecological factors to the evolution of parental care pattern and mating system is a difficult task of key importance. We provide evidence from comparative analyses that an ecological factor (breeding pool size) is associated with the evolution of parental care across all frogs. We further show that the most intensive form of parental care (trophic egg feeding) evolved in concert with the use of small pools for tadpole deposition and that egg feeding was associated with the evolution of biparen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
174
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
174
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To address the role of assortative mating, we conducted triad mate-choice experiments in which we introduced two females (one of each morphs) into the terrarium of a given male, and measured the amount of courtship time between the male and female. This is equivalent to a mutual choice test, which is appropriate here as R. imitator is monogamous 36 , and therefore both sexes should be choosy. We tested preferences in three populations: striped allopatric, striped transition and varadero, allowing us to address two questions (1) whether courtship preferences differ between the stripedtransition and varadero populations, and (2) whether courtship preferences differ among the two populations of the striped morph.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the role of assortative mating, we conducted triad mate-choice experiments in which we introduced two females (one of each morphs) into the terrarium of a given male, and measured the amount of courtship time between the male and female. This is equivalent to a mutual choice test, which is appropriate here as R. imitator is monogamous 36 , and therefore both sexes should be choosy. We tested preferences in three populations: striped allopatric, striped transition and varadero, allowing us to address two questions (1) whether courtship preferences differ between the stripedtransition and varadero populations, and (2) whether courtship preferences differ among the two populations of the striped morph.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frogs of the genus Ranitomeya appear to eat primarily ants (AMMS, unpublished data) which are extremely chitinous and likely energetically expensive to digest. A decrease in consumption of costly prey items, prey specialization, or toxin sequestration could allow more energy to be directed towards the energetically expensive process of monogamous biparental care (Brown et al 2010;Tumulty et al in press). Future work should test the efficacy of this hypothesis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In tree frogs, the location of enough large water pools for egg deposition favours tadpole development (e.g. Brown et al 2010), whereas the parents of some crab and fish species enhance survival by oxygenating eggs via fanning (e.g. Baeza and Fernandez 2002;Green and McCormick 2005).…”
Section: Short-term Benefits Of Parental Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%