2011
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/jbbte.9.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Kangaroo Spine Lumbar Motion Segment Model: Biomechanical Analysis of a Novel <i>In Situ</i> Curing Nucleus Replacement Device

Abstract: This in vitro study compared the effects of nucleotomy alone, with nucleotomy then implantation with a novel nucleus replacement device (D3 device) in a single segment kangaroo spine model. This study utilised dynamic biaxial biomechanical testing of intact, nucleotomy and nucleus replacement implant conditions to evaluate the kinematic behaviour of the single segment kangaroo lumbar spine. Studies have examined the biomechanical efficacy of invasive treatments such as Total Disc Replacement and Intervertebral… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…47,48 But kangaroo lumbar spines have been used previously in in vitro biomechanical studies, and in one case for evaluating biomechanical efficacy of a nucleus replacement implant. 25,49 Just like any other mammalian spine, kangaroo spines have morphological adaptations to accommodate species-specific biomechanical demands. 50 Compared with human lumbar vertebrae, kangaroo's lumbar vertebrae have a smaller vertebral body diameter, greater vertebral body height, enlarged mammillary process, greater prominence of superior articular process above the superior endplate, smaller prominence of inferior articular process below the inferior endplate, comparable transverse distance between the inferior articular processes, and a comparable pedicle length.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47,48 But kangaroo lumbar spines have been used previously in in vitro biomechanical studies, and in one case for evaluating biomechanical efficacy of a nucleus replacement implant. 25,49 Just like any other mammalian spine, kangaroo spines have morphological adaptations to accommodate species-specific biomechanical demands. 50 Compared with human lumbar vertebrae, kangaroo's lumbar vertebrae have a smaller vertebral body diameter, greater vertebral body height, enlarged mammillary process, greater prominence of superior articular process above the superior endplate, smaller prominence of inferior articular process below the inferior endplate, comparable transverse distance between the inferior articular processes, and a comparable pedicle length.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material is contained within a silicone jacket that conforms to the shape of the nucleotomised cavity when inflated and uses a proprietary system of sophisticated delivery instruments to fill the jacket with an inert in situ curing elastomeric filler material. Finite element analysis study and in vitro mechanical testing supported that KDD could restore the axial compressive mechanical properties of a disc after a discectomy and the kinematic changes of a degenerated disc represented by the nucleotomised single motion segment 15,16 . However, to our knowledge, there are no related studies assessing the silicone made in situ curing elastomeric nucleus augmentation device (Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Finite element analysis study and in vitro mechanical testing supported that KDD could restore the axial compressive mechanical properties of a disc after a discectomy and the kinematic changes of a degenerated disc represented by the nucleotomised single motion segment. 15 , 16 However, to our knowledge, there are no related studies assessing the silicone made in situ curing elastomeric nucleus augmentation device (Table 1 ). In this study, we evaluate the biomechanical and biocompatible properties of the novel nucleus augmentation implant (KDD).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, not only the morphometry determines the value of a model but also tissue material properties of bones, intervertebral discs, and ligaments are just as important. Some of these data are represented indirectly by load-deformation characteristics, which can be determined with flexibility tests (Chamoli et al, 2014(Chamoli et al, , 2015Sabet et al, 2011).…”
Section: Con Clus Ionmentioning
confidence: 99%