2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.06.007
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Kalman filter approach to virtual sensing for active noise control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
62
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3,4 In recent years, different approaches have been suggested to realize real-time active noise control (see, e.g., Refs. [5][6][7][8][9][10]. Most of them exploit the least mean square (LMS) algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3,4 In recent years, different approaches have been suggested to realize real-time active noise control (see, e.g., Refs. [5][6][7][8][9][10]. Most of them exploit the least mean square (LMS) algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,10 There have also been a few attempts to apply the virtual sensing and surface integral control to tackle this problem. 8,9 All of them are based on trying to predict the wanted sound component and, therefore, are quite limited because the wanted ingredient cannot completely be separated from the total acoustic field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there has been demand to control the noise at a remote location where it is not feasible to place a microphone, referred to as the virtual location. This has been achieved by modifying the FXLMS algorithm in a number of ways [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. The most popular virtual ANC algorithms are the virtual microphone arrangement [3], the remote microphone technique [4], the forward-difference prediction technique [5], the adaptive LMS virtual microphone technique [6], the Kalman filtering virtual sensing technique [7] and the stochastically optimal tonal diffuse field (SOTDF) virtual sensing method [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been achieved by modifying the FXLMS algorithm in a number of ways [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. The most popular virtual ANC algorithms are the virtual microphone arrangement [3], the remote microphone technique [4], the forward-difference prediction technique [5], the adaptive LMS virtual microphone technique [6], the Kalman filtering virtual sensing technique [7] and the stochastically optimal tonal diffuse field (SOTDF) virtual sensing method [8]. The remote microphone technique [4], seen to be the most effective virtual sensing algorithm, uses the offline identification of two secondary paths: one between the control signal and the physical microphone position and the other between the control signal and the virtual microphone position.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was later extended by using the adaptive leastmean-square (LMS) virtual technique (Cazzolato, 2002) in which an adaptive LMS algorithm was used to obtain the optimal microphone weights for the extrapolation. Based on the optimal state estimation, Petersen et al (2008) utilized a Kalman filter to design a virtual sensor for active noise control system. There was also virtual sensing work conducted for a diffused sound field system (Moreau et al, 2009) or for moving virtual sensing (Petersen et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%