2022
DOI: 10.1002/nme.6925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A k‐means clustering machine learning‐based multiscale method for anelastic heterogeneous structures with internal variables

Abstract: A new machine-learning based multiscale method, called k-means FE 2 , is introduced to solve general nonlinear multiscale problems with internal variables and loading history-dependent behaviors, without use of surrogate models. The macro scale problem is reduced by constructing clusters of Gauss points in a structure which are estimated to be in the same mechanical state. A k-means clustering-machine learning technique is employed to select the Gauss points based on their strain state and sets of internal var… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the solutions to this problem is to utilize k-means clustering on integration points with similar deformation patterns, leading to a reduction in computational cost. The employment of k-means clustering has already been demonstrated in some studies on the homogenization method [58][59][60]. Nevertheless, the present method can evaluate the dislocation dynamics of nanocrystalline models that contain multiple grains based on realistic macroscale deformation history.…”
Section: Loading Case 1 With Nanocrystalline Model Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the solutions to this problem is to utilize k-means clustering on integration points with similar deformation patterns, leading to a reduction in computational cost. The employment of k-means clustering has already been demonstrated in some studies on the homogenization method [58][59][60]. Nevertheless, the present method can evaluate the dislocation dynamics of nanocrystalline models that contain multiple grains based on realistic macroscale deformation history.…”
Section: Loading Case 1 With Nanocrystalline Model Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which specifies for a number of N data discrete strain states j the associated stress states σ j . In a classical boundary value problem, we seek the solution to (3) that preserves both the compatibility condition (1) and a given material law (4). By contrast, in a data-driven framework for constitutive modeling, we seek the data points in D that minimize the violation of ( 1) and (3).…”
Section: Materials Lawsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of these approaches is to compute a homogenized macro‐scale behavior from its underlying heterogeneous microstructure by different interchange of information between scales. Among others, let us mention the multilevel FEM (FE2$$ {}^2 $$ 6–9 ) which computes homogenized fields from the micro‐scale and assigns them at each integration point of the macro‐scale model; the Multiscale FEM (MsFEM 10,11 ) where numerically computed basis functions encode the micro‐scale heterogeneity; global/local coupling 12 that allows to replace the homogenized global model by the fine high‐fidelity model in a certain local region; or direct numerical homogenization 13–16 where macro‐scale material parameters are identified. However, these methods mostly rely on a true separation of scales to alleviate size effects 17,18 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%